Bribery and modern slavery

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

In this subtopic, we examine the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) and its impact on the way commercial organisations must conduct themselves. The BA 2010 came into force on 1 July 2011. It is substantially broader than previous anti-corruption legislation. The BA 2010 applies to any commercial organisation that is incorporated or trades in the UK. It covers bribery committed by the organisation, or on its behalf, in the UK and, crucially for many commercial organisations, anywhere else in the world (ie the BA 2010 has extraterritorial effect).

This subtopic also contains content relating to the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA 2015)—MSA 2015 is aimed at eliminating modern slavery and human trafficking in the UK.

Bribery Act 2010

The BA 2010 is designed to provide an effective legal framework to tackle corruption in both the public and private sectors, modernising the UK’s anti-corruption legislation and replacing the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889–1916.

The BA 2010 created four offences:

  1. •

    bribing another person (BA 2010, s 1)

  1. •

    soliciting or accepting

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Construction News

NHBC Buildmark Choice policies—cause of action accrues when the insured party ‘has to pay more’ to complete the building work as a result of contractor insolvency (NHBC v Peabody Trust)

Construction analysis: The Court of Appeal (CoA) confirmed that the cause of action under Option 1 of the National House Building Council (NHBC) Buildmark Choice policies does not accrue on contractor insolvency—the cause of action accrues when the insured party ‘has to pay more’ to complete the building work as a result of that insolvency. The moment in time at which the insured party should be considered to be in the position of ‘having to pay more’ has been left to be determined in future proceedings.

Construction weekly highlights—24 July 2025

This week's edition of Construction weekly highlights includes the Court of Appeal (CoAs)’s decision in relation to NHBC Buildmark Choice policies confirming that the cause of action accrues when the insured party ‘has to pay more’ to complete the building work as a result of contractor insolvency (National House Building Council v Peabody Trust), Construction Leadership Council (CLC) guidance on Building Control Approval Applications for new higher-risk buildings, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) guidance on the Building Safety Levy, MHCLG’s announcement of legal deadlines for landlords to remediate unsafe cladding in social housing, a Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) consultation on it updated cladding valuation standard, a British Standards Institution (BSI) consultation on a new code of practice for bringing safe construction products to the market, a Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision enforcing an adjudicator’s decision to award the responding party in the adjudication the notified sum (VMA Services v Project One), a CoA decision providing guidance on "costs directly incurred" in a waste management project agreement (Buckinghamshire Council v FCC Buckinghamshire Ltd), an update on the status of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill together with updated guidance from MHCLG on the same, the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA)’s interactive Infrastructure Pipeline tool, and publication of the Welsh Government’s circular on updated building control profession standards and codes.

Senedd Research publishes analysis on Welsh building safety remediation progress

The Senedd Research has published an analysis of building safety remediation progress in Wales, eight years after the Grenfell tragedy. Although Aluminium Composite Material cladding has been removed from all affected Welsh buildings, broader safety concerns persist. The Building Safety (Wales) Bill, currently at Stage 1 of the Senedd’s legislative process, focuses on establishing future safety regimes rather than accelerating current remediation efforts. The Welsh Government’s Building Safety Programme has identified 461 buildings with safety issues, with 60% located in the private sector and 40% in social housing. To date, only 43% of these buildings have either completed or initiated remediation work. Progress is particularly slow for the 161 buildings under the responsibility of major developers, with only 30% having begun or completed the necessary work and only four fully remediated.

CLC publishes new guidance on Higher-Risk Building control approval applications

The Construction Leadership Council (CLC) has published new guidance on Building Control Approval Applications for new Higher-Risk Buildings (Gateway 2). Developed in collaboration with industry stakeholders and the Building Safety Regulator, the guidance outlines the baseline principles for both submitting and assessing applications. It provides practical recommendations on the approach and submission of relevant information for professionals involved in the building control approval process for higher-risk buildings.

View Construction by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

What is the Joint Fire Code referred to in JCT contracts and when does it apply?

What is the Joint Fire Code referred to in JCT contracts and when does it apply?The publication known as the ‘Joint Fire Code’ provides guidance on fire prevention on construction sites. It applies to all parties involved in the supply chain, including those responsible for construction on site, as

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some
What is the Joint Fire Code referred to in JCT contracts and when does it apply?

What is the Joint Fire Code referred to in JCT contracts and when does it apply?

What is the Joint Fire Code referred to in JCT contracts and when does it apply?The publication known as the ‘Joint Fire Code’ provides guidance on fire prevention on construction sites. It applies to all parties involved in the supply chain, including those responsible for construction on site, as

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some