Higher-risk building regime

Following the Grenfell Tower fire, the government carried out an independent review of the Building Regulations and fire safety laws. The final report (Hackitt Report) was published on 17 May 2018, and set out over 50 recommendations, including a new regulator to oversee the construction and management of buildings. See News Analysis: The Hackitt fire safety report—does it go far enough?

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022), which received royal assent in April 2022, was a key part of the government’s response to the Hackitt Report. BSA 2022 paved the way for significant changes to the law on building safety. For general information on the reforms introduced by BSA 2022 and its key provisions, see Practice Note: Building Safety Act 2022—key provisions and issues.

BSA 2022, Pt 3 and Pt 4 provided the framework for a regulatory system applicable to ‘higher-risk’ buildings (HRBs) in England. The HRB regime imposes rigorous building control processes and other legal requirements in relation to HRBs. The regime is overseen by the Building Safety Regulator (BSR), a division of the Health and Safety Executive. At all stages

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

HSE launches calls for evidence on LOLER and PSSR regulations

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has launched two calls for evidence to review whether the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER) and Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR) remain fit for purpose. The consultations aim to identify and reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining safety standards and to assess whether current regulations reflect technological advances. Both reviews form part of HSE's commitment under the UK Government's Regulatory Action Plan published in March 2025, which seeks to simplify and modernise the regulatory system to support economic growth. The consultations target manufacturers, importers, suppliers, users, owners, dutyholders and other relevant organisations. Both consultations opened on 1 October 2025 and close on 11 November 2025.

MHCLG appoints interim Chief Construction Adviser for building safety and regulatory reform

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has announced the appointment of Thouria Istephan as interim Chief Construction Adviser for a 12-month term. Istephan was appointed through a direct ministerial process in line with Cabinet Office guidance. In this role, she will provide independent expert advice to ministers and the government on building safety and regulatory reform. The appointment delivers on the government’s response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations and is intended to guide reform and regulatory design while the position is permanently established next year.

MHCLG publishes second progress report on Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has published its second quarterly report on progress in implementing the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations. Of the 61 recommendations, 58 remain in progress and three have been completed. The report outlines progress across four key areas: (1) the construction industry; (2) fire and rescue services; (3) response and recovery; and (4) vulnerable people. Since the May 2025 update, MHCLG has completed two Phase 1 recommendations (59 and 61), following the laying of the Fire Safety (Residential Evacuation Plans) (England) Regulations 2025, SI 2025/797, on 4 July 2025, which mandate Residential Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) in high rise and higher-risk residential buildings.

Scope of a contractor’s duty of care when managing works affecting the public highway (Brown v Morgan Sindall Construction and Infrastructure Ltd)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: The High Court held Morgan Sindall liable in negligence after a cyclist, Mr Brown, sustained serious injuries when his bicycle struck the base of a missing bollard installed as part of temporary traffic management works outside a construction site. The court found that the exposed, non-reflective base of a ‘Kingpin’ bollard, left in situ after the reflective wand had been removed, constituted an unmarked hazard and an unjustified nuisance on the highway, posing a foreseeable danger to vulnerable road users. The defendant’s failure to undertake an adequate risk assessment, install the bollards in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions, or maintain the system once aware of repeated vandalism rendered the arrangement unsafe. The judgment underscores that principal contractors remain legally responsible for temporary traffic schemes implemented by their subcontractors, even where local authorities or Transport for London (TfL) are consulted. The court rejected arguments that collaboration with TfL or Hackney Council amounted to approval or diluted the defendant’s duty of care: ultimate responsibility for highway safety lay squarely with the contractor. Written by Fiaz Siddique, barrister and accredited mediator, Park Square Barristers Chambers.