Company Director held personally liable for misuse of confidential information (Kieran Corrigan v OneE Group & others)
Information Law analysis: This decision of the High Court arose out of a claim for misuse of confidential information brought against a company and three of its directors. At the original trial, judgment had been given against the company and two of the directors but the other director, Mr Timol had been held not liable. The Court of Appeal had ordered a re-trial of the claim against Mr Timol following late disclosure of relevant documents. At the re-trial, Mr Timol was held personally liable for breach of confidence. He was so found because having received confidential information in circumstances importing a confidentiality obligation on him, his misuse of that information, even if he was not conscious of that use, was a breach of that obligation. Knowledge of wrongdoing was not relevant in this situation. Written by Mark Snelgrove, consultant and IP solicitor at Potter Clarkson LLP.