Contractual joint ventures

This topic studies the creation and life of contractual joint ventures. Contractual joint ventures are joint ventures created by contract. All joint ventures are contractual joint ventures, unless they are incorporated joint ventures (which are normally a company structure overlaid with a shareholders' agreement).

This topic does not cover corporate joint ventures, but information relating to corporate joint ventures is available, see: Planning (corporate joint ventures)—overview. If you are interested in joint ventures relating to property transactions, see: Joint ventures in property transactions—overview.

A contractual joint venture is not a special relationship recognised by law. This distinguishes a contractual joint venture from a partnership or a trust. A contractual joint venture is not a legal entity separate from its participants; it is not a body corporate. This distinguishes a contractual joint venture from a company, limited liability partnership or other body. In legal terms, a contractual joint venture is simply a contractual relationship and like other contractual relationships, other sources of law will impact on the conduct of the parties.

In a contractual joint venture the relationship is between two or more parties who share

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Commercial News

Commercial weekly highlights—16 October 2025

This week's edition of Commercial weekly highlights includes: analysis of the High Court decision in Alaska Airlines v Virgin Aviation where the court ruled in favour of the defendant, granting summary judgment on a claim for sums due under a contract with Alaska Airlines, notwithstanding a defence of circuity of action based on a claim in unjust enrichment, commentary on the new failure to prevent fraud offence which came into force on 1 September 2025 under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, and news that the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology has published a joint ministerial letter on cyber security addressed to all FTSE100 and FTSE250 companies and other leading UK firms.

No Set-Off Clause Effective Against Defence of Circuity of Action (Alaska Airlines v Virgin Aviation)

Commercial analysis: The court granted summary judgment in favour of Virgin Aviation (Virgin) on a claim for sums due under a contract with Alaska Airlines (Alaska), notwithstanding a defence of circuity of action based on a claim in unjust enrichment. The court found that the basis for the unjust enrichment claim was flawed as a matter of construction. However, in the alternative, the court held that the no set off clause would have precluded Alaska from relying on a defence of circuity to resist summary judgment. Written by Joshua Crow, barrister at One Essex Court.

ASA rulings—15 October 2025

One complaint has been received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) about a Red Tractor television advert which, it was alleged, exaggerated the benefits of Red Tractor endorsement by implying broader environmental care and compliance. The ASA has upheld the complaint. This decision has been one of the longest-running ASA investigations (more than two years), and Red Tractor has been highly critical of the outcome.

CAP and BCAP update guidance on under-18s protection in gambling advertising

The Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) have updated their guidance on protecting under-18s in gambling and lotteries advertising. The updated guidance follows three years of experience applying the 'strong appeal' test introduced in 2022, which replaced the previous 'particular appeal' standard for content that might unduly attract under-18s attention. Key updates include clarification on social media following, establishing that at least 100,000 social media follower accounts registered to under-18s across platforms is indicative of strong appeal to minors. The guidance introduces a new Context section explaining how appeal varies by setting and execution, provides further clarification on distinctions between 'adult-centric' and 'non-adult-centric' sports, and includes additional detail on social media's role in the evolving marketing landscape. The changes reflect learning from rulings, stakeholder input and research review since the stricter standard was implemented.