Bills of exchange and promissory notes

What are bills of exchange and promissory notes?

Bills of exchange and promissory notes are widely used in trade finance transactions.

A bill of exchange is an instrument that is used to transfer money from one person to another instead of the transfer of the actual money itself.

A promissory note is often used in similar trade finance situations to a bill of exchange, with the essential difference being that a bill of exchange is an order to pay (usually the drawer ordering the drawee to pay the payee), while a promissory note is a promise to pay (the maker of the note promising to pay the payee).

Bills of exchange and promissory notes are governed by the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 (BEA 1882).

For information on the form that bills of exchange and promissory notes are required to take under BEA 1882 and otherwise, see Practice Note: Form of bills of exchange and promissory notes.

Bills of exchange

Bills of exchange are negotiable instruments that represent an unconditional promise by one party to pay money to another party,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Banking & Finance News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

Popular documents