Set-off and netting

Set-off and netting

This overview is a guide to the Lexis+® Banking & Finance content within the Set-off and netting subtopic, with links to the appropriate materials.

What is set-off?

Set-off is a complex yet important concept in legal proceedings generally and for many different types of transaction.

In certain circumstances, set-off rights arise between two parties who owe each other monetary debts. Set-off is the discharge of reciprocal monetary obligations where one monetary amount is discharged to the extent of the other monetary amount.

A right of set-off allows one of the parties (Y) to apply the amount owed to it by the other party (X) against the amount owed by it to that other party (X), enabling Y to reduce or extinguish its liability to X eg:

If X Company and Y Company both owed each other the same amounts, set-off would extinguish both claims entirely.

Since both parties have reciprocal claims, either party can exercise a right of set-off.

The five main types of set-off

Set-off is available in certain specific circumstances:

•
independent set-off (also known as legal set-off or statutory set-off)

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Banking & Finance News

WFE publishes policy paper on extended trading hours implementation in equity markets

The World Federation of Exchanges (WFE) has published a policy paper titled 'Policy and Market Impacts of Extended Trading', which examines the implementation of extended trading hours in equity markets. The paper evaluates the operational and regulatory requirements for near-continuous trading and concludes that models offering 22/5 or 23/5 trading schedules are more practical than a full 24/7 market. It notes that there is strong investor demand—particularly for major US stocks during Asian trading hours. The analysis highlights several critical considerations, including the need to ensure robust market controls during overnight trading sessions, manage liquidity disclosure for retail investors, and establish accurate closing or reference prices for benchmarks and settlements.

Banking and Finance weekly highlights—11 September 2025

This week's edition of Banking and Finance weekly highlights includes: (1) the LMA announces development of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses following CJEU Lastre decision; (2) the European Parliament adopts T+1 securities settlement cycle regulation; and (3) the Bank of England publishes discussion paper on potential gilt repo market reforms.

UK Finance responds to FCA proposal to remove non-equity SI regime in CP25/20

UK Finance has submitted its response to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) consultation paper CP25/20, expressing strong support for eliminating the systematic internaliser (SI) regime for non-equities. Working in collaboration with Linklaters, the response also addresses the equity market structure. It endorses the current competitive landscape while advocating for the establishment of a UK equity consolidated tape that incorporates both pre- and post-trade data. Additionally, UK Finance stresses the importance of maintaining regulatory flexibility for investment banks’ bilateral trading activities.

ISDA challenges ESMA's liquidity assessment methodology for G-SIB CDS

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has submitted a paper to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Commission on 5 September 2025, in support of its previous response to ESMA’s consultation package 4 (CP4) on derivatives transparency under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. ISDA argues that classifying five-year single-name credit default swaps (CDS) by referencing global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) as liquid instruments contradicts methodologies used for other derivatives and bonds.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

News