Financing the acquisition

This Overview is a guide to the Banking & Finance content within the Financing the acquisition subtopic, with links to the appropriate materials.

Sources of finance

The two main sources of funding for an acquisition finance transaction are equity (or quasi-equity such as loan notes) and debt. The equity/quasi—equity portion will normally be provided by the private equity house sponsoring the transaction and the group's senior management. Debt will be provided by banks and other institutions that invest in debt. The materials in this subtopic focus on debt funding.

For an overview of debt and equity funding, see Practice Note: Sources of finance for leveraged buy-outs.

For information on loan notes, see Practice Note: Loan notes—fundamentals.

Senior facilities

Senior facilities may be provided by banks or institutional investors. Senior facilities may comprise:

  1. term facilities used to fund the acquisition; senior term debt may be provided under one or more term facilities, each of which has different typical characteristics

  2. a working capital facility in the form of a revolving credit facility—depending on the structure of the transaction, this may rank as super senior

Other

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Banking & Finance News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

Popular documents