Double tax treaties

What are double tax treaties?

A double tax treaty, agreement or convention (referred to here as DTTs) is:

  1. an agreement

  2. between two states (known as bilateral agreements) or, more rarely, between more than two states (known as multilateral agreements)

  3. usually to deal with:

    1. the allocation of taxing rights between the two (or more) states (known as contracting states) over income and gains (and in certain DTTs other areas such as estates on death), and

    2. the prevention of avoidance and evasion of tax cross-border

The majority of DTTs are based on one of the international model conventions produced by:

  1. the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

  2. the United Nations (UN), or

  3. the US

DTCs are generally structured in a similar way in three main parts:

  1. the first dealing with key definitions and the scope of the DTT, ie which people and taxes are covered by it

  2. the second, main, part, dealing with specific rules for certain types of income and gains, eg how to deal with dividends paid from one contracting state to the other, and

  3. the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

Market value, distributions and notional transactions—key SDLT lessons from Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC

Tax analysis: In Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC, the Court of Appeal considered the basis on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) should be assessed and whether that resulted in SDLT being paid on the market value, the actual consideration paid, or on some other basis for a complex transaction within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the ‘Case 3’ exception under section 54(4) of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003) applied, which would result in SDLT being charged on the actual consideration. HMRC argued that the exception did not apply, which would result in SDLT being paid on the market value of the property. Alternatively, HMRC argued that if the exception did apply then the anti-avoidance provisions at section 75A FA 2003 applied, potentially resulting in an even higher SDLT charge. The Court of Appeal held that although the Case 3 exception applied, the anti-avoidance provision in FA 2003, s 75A also applied. This resulted in SDLT being assessed on an aggregate amount that was even higher than the property's market value (although HMRC did not seek to increase its assessment beyond market value). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. As explained by Jon Stevens, partner, and Rory Clarke, solicitor, at DWF Law LLP, this decision deals with the interaction of a number of complex SDLT provisions and clarifies the SDLT provisions relating to transfers to connected companies and the SDLT anti-avoidance provisions, with implications for corporate structuring and tax planning.

View Tax by content type :

Popular documents