Loans

Loans

A company's loan capital is, broadly, money that it has borrowed. It represents the company's debt.

What is debt?

Loan capital (debt) can, broadly, be compared and contrasted with share capital (equity). The distinction between debt and equity is critical but not always obvious. Some of the key features of debt are:

•
creditors (lenders) rank ahead of shareholders during an insolvency procedure (ie a lender will need to be repaid before a shareholder)
•
debt normally attracts some form of regular return (eg interest) whereas shares will entitle holders to dividends but only if the company has sufficient distributable reserves to fund them and the board approves them
•
unlike equity, the value of a company's debt will not (normally) be linked to the performance of the company itself, and
•
from a tax perspective, the cost of borrowing money (eg interest) will normally be deductible in calculating a company's profits (ie it is 'above the line')—by contrast, dividends and other distributions, broadly payable on equity instruments, will not be deductible (ie they are paid out of the company's net profit and so are 'below the line')

Borrowing

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT rejects taxpayers’ claims for entrepreneurs’ relief (Moffat and another v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Moffat, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that the taxpayers’ claims for entrepreneurs’ relief (now business asset disposal relief) on the disposal of shares in a company did not succeed because the company was not the holding company of a trading group. The FTT, however, allowed their appeal against penalties imposed by HMRC in respect of the claims, holding that the taxpayers had not behaved carelessly.

FTT finds that provision of ‘leads’ to independent financial advisors constituted VAT exempt financial intermediary services (Performance Leads Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Performance Leads, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal that supplies of ‘lead generation’ services to independent financial advisors (IFAs) fell within the exemption from VAT for intermediary services in relation to financial services transactions.

A win of £1.9m in a longstanding SDLT dispute (Candy v HMRC)

Private Client analysis: The First-tier Tribunal (Tax) (FTT) ruled in the taxpayer’s favour, deciding that Mr. Candy did have four years to lodge the claim for a tax refund. This, in turn, meant that Mr Candy was entitled to receive a £1.92m stamp duty refund after almost a ten-year dispute with HMRC. The decision is likely to benefit taxpayers in stamp duty land tax (SDLT) disputes overpayments, and it provides for a broader interpretation and application of paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Finance Act 2003. Written by Shanzé Shah at Old Square Tax Chambers.

FTT confirms consortium relief ownership proportion based on collective entitlement of link companies (Eastern Power Networks plc and others v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Eastern Power Networks plc and others v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that, when determining the ownership proportion for the purposes of consortium relief, the entitlement of multiple link companies must be assessed collectively, not by aggregating individual entitlements. Additionally, it ruled that a corporate structure designed to enhance consortium relief entitlements constituted a scheme with a main purpose of obtaining a tax advantage.