Pensions analysis: The claimants, retired circuit judges who had been appointed as (part-time) recorders before 1 April 1995 and were appointed as circuit judges after that date, appealed against the decision of the Employment Tribunal that they had not been subjected to unlawful less favourable treatment by comparison with (full-time) circuit judges appointed before that date. The basis of their claim was that, unlike their chosen comparator judges, on appointment as circuit judges they became members of the scheme established by the Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993 (‘JUPRA’) and did not have the option of accruing future benefits under the Judicial Pensions Act 1981 (‘JPA’). The appeal was dismissed and, subject to any further appeal, will bring an end to further, similar, claims by other judges. It is of wider significance because it illustrates the need for care in identifying the characteristics required in any comparator and the time at which the alleged less favourable treatment occurred. Written by Elizabeth Ovey, barrister at Radcliffe Chambers.