Joint ventures in property transactions

A property joint venture (JV) is an arrangement between two or more parties under which they combine disparate contributions in order to derive value from the development, acquisition or management of property. Although in the vast majority of instances that value will be measured in terms of income or capital profits, there are some joint venturers (such as local authorities) who participate for social reasons (eg in relation to urban regeneration schemes, community projects, etc). The contributions made by the joint venturers will usually involve some combination of:

•
cash, or the ability to enter into financing commitments
•
tangible assets, eg land
•
intangible assets, eg expertise, intellectual property, construction services, contractual rights, etc

Property acquisition, investment, development and funding often involves collaborative JVs between a number of parties (property companies, on and off-shore investors, developers, land owners, public sector bodies and funders) who contribute capital, property, resources and skill and share risk. Parties to a JV need to consider:

•
commercial issues surrounding purpose, creation, management, profit and risk sharing and termination of the JV
•
the choice of 'vehicle' or structure for the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

Finance Bill 2025 roundup – 29 November 2024

The UK Government has set out next stages for Parliamentary scrutiny of the Finance Bill.

Property weekly highlights—28 November 2024

This week's edition of Property weekly highlights includes: announcement of key leasehold and commonhold reforms in 2025, the publication of an impact assessment for the Renters’ Rights Bill and cases on estoppel and adverse possession, boundary disputes, capital allowances and stamp duty land tax.

MHCLG announces £3bn support package for housebuilding schemes

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has announced a £3bn support package, in the form of government guarantees, aimed at accelerating housebuilding across the UK. The package seeks to assist builders in securing more accessible loans from banks and lenders. It includes doubling the ENABLE Build scheme to £2bn, supporting smaller housebuilders and firms in delivering over 10,000 new homes. Additionally, the Private Rented Sector Guarantee Scheme will reopen at the end of 2024 with nearly £2bn allocated for Build-to-Rent developers. These measures are expected to facilitate the construction of over 20,000 new homes, contributing to the government's goal of building 1.5 million homes over the next five years.

Family feud clarifies estoppel argument in adverse possession (Malik v Malik)

Property Disputes analysis: This case came before the Court of Appeal on 4 November 2024 after a long running history which involved two brothers, Iftikhar Malik and Vaqar Malik. The dispute between the brothers related to the ownership of a valuable two-bedroom property at 7 South Lodge, 245 Knightsbridge, London. It was concluded in the lower courts that the flat was purchased solely by Iftikhar as the legal and beneficial owner and there was no appeal against that finding. The Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether Vaqar could establish an interest in the flat under the doctrine of adverse possession. Iftikhar successfully defended the claim for adverse possession by way of estoppel by conduct based on Vaqar’s assertions made at a hearing in 2012 which Iftikhar claimed estopped Vaqar from bringing a claim for adverse possession at a later date. The case helps to show that legal practitioners must be careful to ensure that no misleading representations are made in proceedings which could later give rise to an estoppel argument if the other party has relied upon those representations to their detriment. Written by Sejal Johar, senior associate and Roxanne Watson, associate at Browne Jacobson LLP.