Personal representatives

Definition of a personal representative

Executors and administrators of deceased estates are collectively referred to as personal representatives (PRs).

An executor is a person appointed by a valid Will or codicil to administer the testator’s property and carry out the provisions of the Will. If the deceased left a Will but there is no executor able or willing to act then an administrator may take a grant of letters of administration with Will annexed. A simple grant of letters of administration is required where the deceased did not leave a Will, often where they died fully intestate. Again it will be an administrator who is appointed as PR in that case.

A testator is free to appoint anyone as an executor in their Will. If there is no valid appointment of an executor then any person who is entitled under rules 20 or 22 of the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987, SI 1987/2024 (NCPR 1987) may apply for a grant of letters of administration (with Will annexed) or if there is no Will, a simple grant of letters of administration.

Where a person deals with matters relating to a deceased

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

FTT holds that OIGs and AIPs arising in offshore protected trusts are not protected foreign source income (Louwman v Revenue and Customs Commissioners)

Private Client analysis: The case of Louwman v Revenue and Customs concerned Ms Louwman, a UK resident non-domiciled taxpayer who had set up offshore protected property trusts on 7 March 2017, just prior to the implementation of the deemed domicile regime on 6 April 2017. Ms Louwman sought to shield income and gains in those trusts from taxation after she became deemed domiciled for the tax year commencing 6 April 2018, on the basis that the trusts were offshore protected property trusts and the income and gains in those trusts would not be attributed to her on an arising basis. HMRC assessed Ms Louwman to income tax on the basis that offshore income gains (OIGs) and accrued income profits (AIPs) that had arisen in the offshore protected trusts were subject to income tax on an arising basis. Ms Louwman resisted the assessments on the basis that these items of income were ‘protected foreign source income’. The matter went to the irst-tier tribunal for determination and the tribunal considered that the items of income were not ‘protected foreign source income’ on the basis that they could not be said to have a source, and particularly a foreign source. The tribunal therefore considered that they should be subject to income tax. The tribunal also considered that it was not appropriate to take a rectifying interpretation of the definition of ‘protected foreign source income’ in section 721A of the Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA 2007) even though OIGs and AIPs may have been omitted from the definition of protected foreign source income by the inadvertence of Parliament. Written by Ben Symons, barrister at Old Square Tax Chambers.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents