Distribution of the estate

Estate administration

For information about the administration of an estate leading up to the distribution assets (which is also part of the administration), see Overview: Estate administration—overview.

Probate involving vulnerable or disabled individuals

There are a number of scenarios in which a probate practitioner should consider making adjustments for disabled or vulnerable individuals who are involved in the administration of an estate, either as personal representatives (PRs) or beneficiaries, perhaps due to visual, communication or mobility issues. Such adjustments might include providing written advice in larger print, ensuring access and suitable parking for meetings, making home visits or arranging for a suitable translator.

As well as acting sensitively when dealing with, or having some responsibility for, a vulnerable person in relation to the administration of an estate, common sense is also required. It is not always simple to ascertain who may or may not be a vulnerable person. Nor are all disabilities visible. It is clear that a person may have a disability but not be classed as (nor wish to be treated as) vulnerable. Equally a vulnerable person may not have a recognised disability.

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

All in? Court confirms when a settlement is 'made' for the purposes of excluded property (Accuro Trust (Switzerland) SA v The Commissioners for HMRC)

Private Client analysis: This case considered the meaning of 'relevant property' under the settlements regime of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (IHTA 1984) and, in particular, the time at which this definition is to be tested. The question arose as to whether the trustees of an offshore trust established by a non-UK domiciled settlor were subject to the UK settlements regime in respect of property added to the trust after the settlor became deemed domiciled in the UK, or whether they were exempt from such charges as the trust consisted solely of excluded property. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that whether trust property is excluded property is based on the status of the trust at the time that it was established, not at the time that the property in question was added to the settlement. As a result, the trust in this case did consist solely of excluded property and no inheritance tax (IHT) charges arose as a result of either the ten-year anniversary or capital distributions. The FTT was also asked to consider whether their jurisdiction was appellate, or supervisory only. The FTT held that, while their jurisdiction was supervisory, the questions raised by the trustees were relevant in establishing whether HMRC had acted reasonably and that the outcome (ie that the paid IHT should be refunded and that no further IHT was due) would be the same in either case. Written by Katherine Willmott, senior associate solicitor at Foot Anstey LLP.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents