Offshore companies

Offshore companies

Planning for international private clients often involves the use of non-UK resident companies, whether owned directly by individuals or through an offshore trust/company structure.

Offshore companies are mainly used for UK tax planning when the owner is non-resident or UK resident but not domiciled in the UK. For guidance on the taxation of non-resident individuals and UK resident non-domiciliaries, see the Non-resident individuals—overview and the Non-domiciliaries and the remittance basis—overview.

As a general rule, directly owned offshore companies holding investments and other assets cannot be used to shelter income and gains from UK tax if the owner is UK resident and domiciled. This is the effect of two codes, the transfer of assets code (TAA Code) directed at income and section 3 of Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992) at capital gains. See: UK resident individuals—taxation of income derived from assets held within offshore companies and UK resident individuals—taxation of capital gains derived from assets held within offshore companies below. See also Clarke's Offshore Tax Planning—Trusts and Companies:

•
Chapter 6 Non—resident companies [6.1], and
•
Chapter 15.1 Underlying

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

Question of the week: Where a trust of a life policy otherwise falls within the definition of an 'excluded trust' set out in paragraph 4 of Schedule 3A of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, does it lose that excluded trust status if it opens a non-interest bearing bank account in order to pay insurance premiums for the policy?

This Q&A considers whether a trust of a life policy, which otherwise falls within the definition of an 'excluded trust' as set out in the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, Sch 3A, para 4 loses its excluded trust status if it opens a non-interest bearing bank account to pay insurance premiums for the policy.

Tax update spring 2025—Tax analysis

Tax analysis: On 28 April 2025, the government announced a package of technical tax policy proposals aimed at simplifying and reforming the tax system and improving tax administration. These announcements included the publication of draft legislation, new consultations, various technical papers and responses to consultations, as well as updates on previously announced measures together with new initiatives.

Sizeable refunds could follow taxpayer’s FTT win as HMRC directed to issue enquiry closure notices in ten-year dispute (Refinitiv Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Refinitiv Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) directed that HMRC issue closure notices in respect of enquiries into 2018 corporation tax returns, averring that it had not met the burden of proof required for the enquiries to be kept open.

High Court makes order regarding funeral arrangements where two executors disagree (Patel v Patel)

Private Client analysis: The High Court has resolved a dispute between two executors over the funeral arrangements for their father, a devout Hindu. In a sensible and sensitive decision which reviewed and applied settled principles, the judge (HHJ Paul Matthews) considered the various factors which favoured cremation in England over burial in India. These included the wishes of the deceased, the views of his family, the strength of his connections to the UK and India, and practicalities such as cost and delay. While the relevant factors and their relative weight will inevitably be fact-sensitive, similar factors are likely to recur in many such cases. What is clear is that no single factor (in particular, the deceased’s own wishes) will necessarily be conclusive, so that the court must weigh all relevant factors with care. Written by Kyle Bonnell, barrister at XXIV Old Buildings.