Cross-border planning

This subtopic draws together cross-border content from the Wills, Probate (non-contentious), Trusts and Court of Protection topics in Private Client. The aim is to make such content easy to find for those seeking guidance on cross-border issues. For context and more general guidance, please refer to the further content in the relevant topic.

This subtopic covers cross-border issues relating to Wills and succession, the administration of estates, cross-border estates and UK inheritance tax (IHT), UK resident trusts and mental incapacity. For an introduction to the basic concepts that underpin cross-border and offshore planning see: International private client—general principles—overview.

It is often necessary to consider private international law when advising on cross-border tax and estate planning to resolve conflicts between the laws of different jurisdictions. For information on the principles of private international law, see Practice Note: Private client and private international law—summary of main principles.

Wills and succession

Validity of Wills

When drafting a Will with cross-border elements under the laws of England and Wales it is necessary to ensure that the Will is formally valid (ie admissible to probate) and also materially

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

All in? Court confirms when a settlement is 'made' for the purposes of excluded property (Accuro Trust (Switzerland) SA v The Commissioners for HMRC)

Private Client analysis: This case considered the meaning of 'relevant property' under the settlements regime of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (IHTA 1984) and, in particular, the time at which this definition is to be tested. The question arose as to whether the trustees of an offshore trust established by a non-UK domiciled settlor were subject to the UK settlements regime in respect of property added to the trust after the settlor became deemed domiciled in the UK, or whether they were exempt from such charges as the trust consisted solely of excluded property. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that whether trust property is excluded property is based on the status of the trust at the time that it was established, not at the time that the property in question was added to the settlement. As a result, the trust in this case did consist solely of excluded property and no inheritance tax (IHT) charges arose as a result of either the ten-year anniversary or capital distributions. The FTT was also asked to consider whether their jurisdiction was appellate, or supervisory only. The FTT held that, while their jurisdiction was supervisory, the questions raised by the trustees were relevant in establishing whether HMRC had acted reasonably and that the outcome (ie that the paid IHT should be refunded and that no further IHT was due) would be the same in either case. Written by Katherine Willmott, senior associate solicitor at Foot Anstey LLP.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents