Appropriating land and overriding rights

Section 203 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 (HPA 2016) confers powers to override easements and other rights benefitting the adjoining land in connection with development. See Practice Note: Section 203 powers—interference with rights for development purposes.

Section 203 came into effect on 13 July 2016 and extended and replaced powers set out in section 237 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990), by introducing that the power will apply where the local authority could acquire the land compulsorily for the purposes of development.

HPA 2016, s 203 (and its predecessor, TCPA 1990, s 237) has been relied on in high-profile developments to overcome rights of light and other easements or restrictive covenants threatening to prevent projects from progressing. In practice, where a particular development programme is at risk due to the inability to agree the release of certain rights, developers have requested that the local authority intervenes by using its powers to appropriate or acquire the development site to then trigger the power in HPA 2016, s 203. Once the site has

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Planning News

High Court gives guidance on the new duty to ‘seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty’ of AONB for planning authorities (CPRE Kent v SSHCLG)

Planning analysis: Section 85(A1) of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (CRWA 2000) came into effect on 26 December 2023 following amendments to that Act made by section 245 of the Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 (LURA 2023). The provision requires relevant authorities to ‘seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty’ of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (‘AONB’) when exercising functions affecting such land. This case concerned a challenge to the November 2024 decision of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (‘the Secretary of State’) to grant planning permission for the construction of 165 dwellings and associated works in the High Weald AONB. The grounds of challenge were that the Secretary of State had breached the CRWA 2000, s 85(A1) duty (Ground 1) or alternatively, had given inadequate reasons for concluding that the duty had been complied with (Ground 2). The main issue for the High Court was whether the words ‘seek to further’ contained in the amended section 85(A1) duty had altered the substance of the duty so as to require a decision-maker to refuse planning permission for development if it is found that the proposal would cause harm to an AONB by failing to conserve or enhance its natural beauty. In dismissing the claim and upholding the Secretary of State’s decision, the judge provided guidance on the requirements of the CRWA 2000, s 85(A1) duty in the context of planning decisions affecting AONBs. Written by Max Millington, barrister at Cornerstone Barristers.

View Planning by content type :

Popular documents