Table of contents
- Original news
- What were the key issues before the Supreme Court?
- What did the court decide?
- To what extent does the court’s decision clarify the law in relation to a receiver’s lien?
- How did the court approach the questions of foreseeability and proportionality?
- What are the implications of the decision for lawyers and their clients?
- What lessons can be learned from this case?
Article summary
Commercial analysis: Who should pay the costs and expenses of a management receiver? Martin Evans, barrister at 33 Chancery Lane looks at the effect of a recent Supreme Court decision on restraint and receivership orders.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial