Company voluntary arrangements

General

The applicable legislation is the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024.

A company voluntary arrangement (CVA) is a contractual agreement between a company and its creditors and is the corporate equivalent of individual voluntary arrangements (IVAs) for individuals (see Practice Note: Company voluntary arrangements—an introductory guide). The main benefits of CVAs include:

  1. there's no need to prove insolvency, so action can be taken early at the first signs of distress

  2. dissenting unsecured creditors can be crammed down if the CVA is approved by 75% in value of creditors present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal (and not opposed by more than 50% of independent creditors ie those who are not associates). The CVA proposal will even bind creditors who are unaware of the CVA proposal/creditors' decision procedures

However, the main limitation is the lack of any automatic moratorium (the small companies moratorium was abolished by CIGA 2020). Accordingly, CVAs are sometimes combined with administrations to benefit from the moratorium arising under administration or could

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :

Popular documents