Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the UT decide?
Article summary
Property Disputes analysis: In Hancock and another v Scott and others, the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UT) ruled that changes in the neighbourhood rendered a restrictive covenant set in 1947 obsolete. Emma Humphreys, partner at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, comments on the case and its implications.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial