The following Property Disputes practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The primary remedy for breach of a restrictive covenant is a permanent injunction to restrain the breach. However, the courts have jurisdiction to award damages instead of an injunction.
The court's jurisdiction is equitable (except in the case of a breach by an original covenantor) so the court has discretion as to the appropriate remedy. The court is entitled to consider conduct, for example, delay or inactivity by the neighbour as evidence that an award of damages in lieu of an injunction will be appropriate.
In Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting[1891-94] All ER Rep 838, the court confirmed the ‘working rule’ (Shelfer rules) for awarding damages instead of an injunction was if:
injury to the claimant's legal rights is small
the injury is capable of being valued in money terms
it can be compensated by a small money payment, and
it would be oppressive to the defendant to grant an injunction.
However, in Coventry v Lawrence  All ER (D) 245 (Feb), (a noise nuisance case) the Supreme Court confirmed there were problems with the current authorities on the proper approach to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction to award damages instead of an injunction due to the conflicting authorities since Shelfer.
It confirmed that the court should adopt a flexible approach. An almost mechanical application of the Shelfer rules and
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
The principles of the notarial act are that it is:•an act of the notary and not of the parties named in the document•a record of a fact, event or transaction•in the form of a document, notwithstanding the form of the underlying document, fact, event or transactionThe purpose of the notarial act is
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
What is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.