Home / EU Law

Legal News

European Parliament adopts CRR III proposals

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 26 April 2024
Published by LNB News

LNB News 26/04/2024

Document Information

Issue Date: 26 April 2024

Published Date: 26 April 2024

Jurisdiction(s): Eire and European Union

Article summary

The European Parliament has adopted at first reading the legislative proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
Eire and European Union

Related documents:

2 Checklists
1 Flowcharts
4 News
View More
5 Practice notes
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

2 Checklists
1 Flowcharts
4 News
View More
5 Practice notes
View More

Popular documents

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Where are misrepresentations made? Jurisdictional traps for the unwary (Bellmare Holdings Ltd v Wells)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The High Court has provided concise guidance as to how misrepresentation should be analysed when considering jurisdictional gateways. Under Article 5(3) of the Lugano Convention, in negligent misstatement cases, the place of the event giving rise to damage is normally