Home / EU Law

Legal News

ESMA launches consultation on MiFIR derivatives transparency requirements

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 03 April 2025

Published by LNB News

LNB News 03/04/2025

Document Information

Issue Date: 03 April 2025

Published Date: 03 April 2025

Jurisdiction(s): Eire and European Union

Article summary

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has launched a consultation on three sets of proposed Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Review. The consultation covers transparency requirements for exchange traded derivatives (ETD) and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, amendments to package orders requirements, and input/output data specifications for the OTC derivatives consolidated tape. Responses are requested by 3 July 2025 and ESMA plans to submit final draft technical standards to the European Commission in Q4 2025.

Popular documents

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can the personal licence holder apply for a Temporary Events Notice (TEN) to open for longer hours than those permitted in the planning permission?To use any property for a licensable activity both

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to