Table of contents
- Original news
- What was the background to the appeal?
- What were the legal issues that the Court of Appeal had to decide?
- What did the Court of Appeal decide and why?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law?
- What practical lessons can lawyers advising lenders at the time that security is being granted take away from this case?
- What practical lessons can lawyers advising lenders or administrators at the time of enforcement take away from this case?
Article summary
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: What are the legal consequences of crystallisation of a floating charge? Tina Kyriakides, barrister at Radcliffe Chambers, examines the Court of Appeal’s answer in Saw (SW) 2010 Ltd and another v Wilson and other and says the decision confirms that whether a charge is a qualifying floating charge is to be determined at the time of its creation.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial