Business rates (NNDR)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This subtopic provides guidance in relation to the revenue raising and retention powers of local authorities in relation to hereditaments (units of property) in their area through the national non-domestic rates (NNDR). It explains:

  1. •

    the legislative operation of the scheme and how it has evolved

  2. •

    the assessment of rateable value

  3. •

    who is liable for payment of NNDR

  4. •

    when an exemption of liability is appropriate

  5. •

    what discretionary reductions and reliefs for NNDR may be claimed

  6. •

    how the system is billed, collected and recovered

Legislative framework

As a tax on property, rates have existed in some form since 1601. The revenue raising framework currently in place was largely established by the Local Government Finance Act 1988 (LGFA 1988). LGFA 1988 established that:

  1. •

    rates were to be raised only on non-domestic property—occupiers of domestic property would instead pay community charges (from 1993 replaced by council tax, see Practice Note: Council tax)

  2. •

    rates bills were to be set nationally by way of government specified multipliers to be applied to rateable values for each financial year

  3. •

    local authorities would administer

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Local Government News

Key planning provisions in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill

Planning analysis: The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill was introduced to the House of Commons on 10 July 2025 and is awaiting a second reading. The Bill gives legislative effect to the government’s ambitions to reintroduce strategic planning across England and create a consistent framework for devolved powers. This analysis looks at the key planning provisions of the Bill, alongside the background to its introduction and the potential implications for the planning and development sector.

Post adoption contact—where are we now? (Re S (Placement Order Contact))

Family analysis: The Court of Appeal judgment in Re S (Placement Order Contact) carefully considers the court’s approach to contact between siblings at the placement for adoption stage. There has been a shift in recent years with a great deal of research as to the potential advantages to adopted children of maintaining some sort of direct contact with their birth family. That being said, on the ground it remains unusual for orders to be made under section 26 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002) for direct contact, with proposals in final care plans often being for indirect or letterbox contact. The Court of Appeal makes clear that in each case where placement orders are made, there needs to be a bespoke analysis of the future contact arrangements, in order to meet the complex and life-long needs of children who are to be placed for adoption. Written by Gemma Adams, associate solicitor at Dawson Cornwell LLP.

High Court refuses permission to review Government’s export decision on combat aircraft components—R (Al-Haq v Secretary of State for Business)

Public Law analysis: Judicial review—the High Court refused permission to bring judicial review proceedings in respect of the government’s decision to exclude licences for the export of components for F-35 combat aircraft which could not be identified as destined for Israel (the F-35 exclusion). On 2 September 2024, the defendant, the Secretary of State for Business and Trade (the SSBT), decided to suspend licences authorising the export of items that might be used in carrying out or facilitating Israeli military operations in the conflict in Gaza. The SSBT did so explicitly because the government had formed the view that Israel was not committed to compliance with international humanitarian law in the conflict in Gaza and that there was therefore a clear risk that such items might be used in that conflict to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law. The claimant, supported by the interveners, challenged the lawfulness of the F-35 exclusion, which was referred to in the judgment as the ‘F-35 Carve Out’. Written by Rowena Wisniewska Sethi, barrister at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square Chambers.

MHCLG confirms six regions for Devolution Priority Programme implementation

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has confirmed six regions for the Devolution Priority Programme (DPP), following the introduction of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill to Parliament , which aims to decentralise power and ignite regional growth, helping local people take back control of their regions. The programme will establish Mayoral Strategic Authorities in Cumbria, Cheshire and Warrington, Norfolk and Suffolk, Greater Essex, Sussex and Brighton and Hampshire and the Solent. Inaugural elections are scheduled for May 2026, while Cumbria and Cheshire and Warrington will hold elections in May 2027. MHCLG confirms thirty-year investment funds will remain part of the devolution package. Funding will also be standardised to increase transparency and fairness.

View Local Government by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

If a property is held on trust, who has liability for council tax, the trustees or the beneficiary?

If a property is held on trust, who has liability for council tax, the trustees or the beneficiary?The principal factor in determining council tax liability will be physical residence of the dwelling, rather than the status of ownership. This follows the hierarchy for council tax liability under

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an
If a property is held on trust, who has liability for council tax, the trustees or the beneficiary?

If a property is held on trust, who has liability for council tax, the trustees or the beneficiary?

If a property is held on trust, who has liability for council tax, the trustees or the beneficiary?The principal factor in determining council tax liability will be physical residence of the dwelling, rather than the status of ownership. This follows the hierarchy for council tax liability under

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an