Diplomatic assistance for Gazan clients and rationality review (R (BEL & others) v SSFCDO)
Public Law analysis: The High Court allowed a judicial review claim brought by a family in Gaza, against the refusal of the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs (FCDO) to assist them with exiting Gaza. In doing so, the High Court ruled that, even those Gazan clients who do not fall within the FCDO’s ‘Extended Eligibility Criteria’ potentially are entitled to diplomatic assistance from the UK, if they have strong family life in the UK. The court rejected an argument from the claimant under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and held that there is no duty under Article 8 ECHR to provide diplomatic assistance. However, the court held that the FCDO’s refusal was irrational for not engaging with important features (the family’s exceptional Article 8 rights which secured them Entry Clearance, cohort implications, and real-world feasibility) and ordered reconsideration. No mandatory order was provided. Written by Parvez Anwar Pantho, caseworker at Duncan Lewis.