Q&As

These Q&As seek to briefly address common questions faced when dealing with Life Sciences matters.

The Q&As supplement and link to other more detailed content within Lexis®+ UK, but are intentionally short. It is anticipated that a brief Q&A will be most helpful when you need a quick overview of an issue and its likely impact. This might arise, for example, for lawyers needing to provide advice, provide business development or training at short notice. The Q&A content on Lexis®+ UK Practical Guidance is date stamped. This date is the publish date and

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Life Sciences News

Life Sciences weekly highlights—4 September 2025

This week’s edition of Life Sciences weekly highlights includes a Law360 news analysis on the Patents Court striking out Sandoz’s claim for an account of profits made from selling blood-thinning treatment Xarelto during an interim sales ban against Bayer and news that the Patents Court addressed cost and interim payments following patent litigation in a complex dispute involving diabetes treatment dapagliflozin. Also included is news that the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) published its opinion on the proposed EU Critical Medicines Act and Medicines for Europe responded to the European Parliament’s draft report on the Act, highlighting areas of concern, the Commission opened a consultation on revised Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) quality system guidelines, the MHRA published an update to its March 2025 government response on statutory fees following post-market surveillance legislation for medical devices and published revised guidance on clinical investigations for medical devices, MedTech Europe published a position paper on aligning EU digital legislation with sector-specific frameworks and responded to the Commission’s consultation on extending the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Further news included is that the ABPI announced that the Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing, Access, and Growth (VPAG) scheme review negotiations with the UK government have ended without agreement, the EESC issued its opinion on the EU’s cybersecurity action plan for healthcare, the HRA published a report on the legal and ethical use of patient information in research, the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) updated guidance on Clauses 3.1 and 11 of the ABPI Code of Practice, which prohibit the promotion of medicines prior to marketing authorisation, among other stories.

View Life Sciences by content type :

Popular documents