International treaties and conventions

The national nature of intellectual property laws

IP laws are almost always national in nature. However, there are many conventions and treaties under which nations agree to provide minimum levels of IP protection, and to protect IP created by nationals of other countries.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) administers over 20 treaties and conventions on the registration, classification and protection of IP. Details of the treaties it administers, and the parties to those treaties, can be found on its website. This subtopic examines some of the key conventions and treaties it administers.

For further information, see Practice Note: Intellectual property international treaties and conventions.

International aspects of copyright

An international system of copyright enforcement exists and it is established by four conventions. The effect of use of the conventions is that copyright can be enforced cross-border. At the heart of the system is the principle of national treatment. This means that a copyright owner will be treated as if they are a national

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

EUIPO releases study examining GenAI copyright implications under EU law

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has published a study on 12 May 2025 examining the legal implications of using copyright-protected works to train generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The study analyses current EU legislation, including the Copyright in Directive (EU) 2019/790 (Single Market Directive) and anticipated provisions of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024, focusing on three areas: assessing the legal status of using copyright-protected material for AI training, evaluating rights protection mechanisms, and addressing challenges associated with the regulatory framework for AI-generated content. The report also considers the economic impact of copyright-intensive sectors and potential revenue opportunities from an emerging market for AI training data. The EUIPO has also announced plans to launch a Copyright Knowledge Centre in November 2025 to provide centralised copyright services and policy guidance.

IPO confirms permanent adoption of UK+ intellectual property exhaustion regime

The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has announced the government's decision to maintain the UK+ exhaustion regime as the permanent framework for parallel imports. The regime, in place since January 2021, allows parallel imports from the European Economic Area (EEA) into the UK when goods are first placed on the market in either the UK or EEA. Following a consultation that received 150 responses, the IPO reports that a majority of respondents favoured maintaining the UK+ regime. The decision aims to provide certainty for businesses while ensuring compatibility with the UK's international obligations under the Windsor Framework. The regime will continue to apply across all IP rights including patents, trade marks, designs and copyright.

Clarity and precision requirements for visual and verbal descriptions of trade marks (Babek v Iceland)

IP analysis: The IPEC dismissed Iceland Foods Ltd’s (‘Iceland’) application for summary judgment based on its counterclaim of invalidity against Babek International Ltd’s (‘Babek’) UK trade mark 907527963 (the ‘Trade Mark’), ultimately finding the mark to be validly registered, per sections 1(1) and 3(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994). As the Trade Mark was found to be clear and precise, there was no case to consider invalidating the registration under TMA 1994, s 47. The court was not swayed by an overly pedantic reading of the registration and relevant case law, opting instead for a pragmatic approach. The infringement case brought by Babek will now progress. It serves as a reminder to trade mark lawyers that clarity and precision must be prioritised in drafting the graphical representations and written descriptions included in trade mark applications. The judgment offers an insight into not only the court’s reasoning when considering the clarity and precision of a registration, but also the fact the court is reluctant to take too restrictive an approach even where there are perceived discrepancies between the graphical representation and written description. Written by Mark Daniels, partner at Browne Jacobson LLP and Nirmal Trivedy, associate at Browne Jacobson LLP.

Dapagliflozin—UK court reaffirms plausibility standard despite G 2/21

IP analysis: In a significant UK ruling in Generics (UK) Ltd v AstraZeneca AB, the High Court of England and Wales provided a comprehensive restatement of how inventive step and sufficiency are assessed in the UK in light of the concept of ‘plausibility’. Ian Jones, partner, of Gill Jennings & Every LLP considers the court’s ruling.