Design transactions and management

What are design rights?

Design rights protect the shape, configuration or appearance of the whole or part of a product/article (rather than its functional aspects).

Design law is intended to stop other people making products which are made to the design of or create the same overall impression as the original design.

This Overview covers the various design rights (both registered and unregistered) that can be relied on by right holders in the UK.

Design rights currently available in the UK

The design rights currently available in the UK are as follows:

  1. UK registered designs (including re-registered designs and re-registered international designs)

  2. UK unregistered design right (also known as ‘design right’)

  3. supplementary unregistered design right (SUD)

Each of the above rights differs in terms of qualifying criteria, scope and duration of protection. For more information, see Practice Note: UK registered and unregistered designs.

The impact of Brexit

Prior to Brexit, the UK designs regime was significantly harmonised with the EU regime.

The Designs Directive (Directive 98/71/EC) harmonised the requirements for national registered design protection across the EU. It was incorporated

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest IP News

The construction of jurisdiction clauses in the context of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and the mechanisms of service(Campeau v Gottex Real Asset Fund 1 (OE) Waste S.À.R.L)

Dispute Resolution analysis: This case considers a jurisdictional clause in the context of service under CPR 6.33(2B)(b), which allows service out of the jurisdiction where the defendant is party to a jurisdiction clause. There is no corresponding requirement for the claimant to be a party to that jurisdiction clause. The starting point is that jurisdiction clauses are not generally intended to concern disputes with third parties. However, that is no more than a starting point and one which can be departed from in appropriate cases. This was one such appropriate case whereby the circumstances and construction of the clause led to the finding that it did include the third party claimant’s (Mr Campeau) claim. While not strictly necessary given the judge’s findings in relation to the construction of the clause, Mr Justice Butcher considered that, where a jurisdictional clause was wide enough to encompass disputes from third parties, then it will likely also amount to a ‘relevant term’ for the purposes of section 1(4) of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (C(RTP)A 1999). That meant that the third party, in seeking to enforce their rights under the SPA, was statutorily obliged to do so in England and so could rely upon CPR 6.33 (2B) (b) in that respect also. Written by Georgia Whiting, legal counsel (contentious construction) at Capita.

View IP by content type :

Popular documents