Database disputes

Database right

Database right is a proprietary right governed by the Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations 1997 (CRD 1997), SI 1997/3032, which implemented Directive 96/9/EC (EU Database Directive). Database right arises automatically when there has been a substantial investment in obtaining, verifying or presenting the database contents. A database is defined as a ‘collection of independent works, data or other materials which are arranged in a systematic or methodical way and are individually accessible by electronic or other means’ (CRD 1997, SI 1997/3032, reg 12, and section 3A(1) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA 1988)). For example, the definition of database would include an electronic or hard copy encyclopedia or a telephone directory.

Database right can subsist whether or not the database or its contents are a copyright work. There is no requirement for an 'author’s own intellectual creation' (as there is for copyright); the test is whether there has been a 'substantial investment' and this will turn on the facts as not all databases qualify for protection. Database right only protects the arrangement of the database as a means of storing

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

EPO finalises 2026 guidelines following user consultation on evidence standards and AI patentability

The European Patent Office (EPO) has concluded its discussions on the 2026 EPC, PCT-EPO, and Unitary Patent Guidelines. Following the circulation of draft texts and receipt of nearly 400 user comments, the EPO provided written responses and engaged in focused dialogue on key issues. It confirmed that all three sets of guidelines will be published in PDF format and committed to improving the visibility of interim Official Journal publications. Notable developments include the introduction of new chapters detailing entry into the European phase, clarification of legal standards following decisions G 1/24 and G 2/21, and ongoing efforts to refine guidance on the patentability of antibodies and AI-related inventions. While consensus was not reached on all topics, the EPO pledged further review and consultation, with the full results to be published after presentation to the Patent Law Committee on 23 October. The revised guidelines will take effect on 1 April 2026, with a preview available in February and a subsequent public consultation.

AI and copyright—creatives write to the Prime Minister

IP analysis: Rachel Alexander at Wiggin LLP comments on a recent letter to the Prime Minister, signed by numerous individuals and organisations across the creative industries, which argues that the government’s current stance on safeguarding copyright from potential AI-driven infringement ‘fails to account for international and UK human rights law’.

IP weekly highlights—16 October 2025

This week's edition of IP weekly highlights includes: a hand-picked summary of news analysis, updates and new content from the world of IP. These highlights focus on the key rights of copyright and associated rights, database rights, trade marks and passing off, designs, and patents as well as covering issues relating to confidential information, know-how R&D and IP disputes.

No Set-Off Clause Effective Against Defence of Circuity of Action (Alaska Airlines v Virgin Aviation)

Commercial analysis: The court granted summary judgment in favour of Virgin Aviation (Virgin) on a claim for sums due under a contract with Alaska Airlines (Alaska), notwithstanding a defence of circuity of action based on a claim in unjust enrichment. The court found that the basis for the unjust enrichment claim was flawed as a matter of construction. However, in the alternative, the court held that the no set off clause would have precluded Alaska from relying on a defence of circuity to resist summary judgment. Written by Joshua Crow, barrister at One Essex Court.