Boilerplate clauses

This subtopic focuses on boilerplate clauses in commercial business-to-business agreements. For information on commercial clauses more generally, see: Commercial clauses—overview.

For information on boilerplate in business-to-consumer contracts, see the section on ‘Consumer boilerplate’ below.

For information on boilerplate in public sector contracts, see the section on ‘Public sector boilerplate’ below.

The role of boilerplate

Lawyers work on a huge variety of transactions, but all of them will in some way involve written agreements. All of those agreements should contain some boilerplate clauses.

‘Boilerplate’ is the term used to describe the clauses that are included in an agreement to deal with the mechanics of how it works and those legal points that are relevant to most transactions. For further consideration of the role and importance of boilerplate clauses, see Practice Note: The role of boilerplate.

Boilerplate clauses are generally found at the beginning and the end of an agreement. Such clauses are often thought of as standard, miscellaneous provisions, but this is a very dangerous view to adopt. It is not unusual for a boilerplate clause to be the cause of litigation. Since a boilerplate clause

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

DSIT publishes report and impact assessment on copyright and artificial intelligence

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Intellectual Property Office have jointly published a report and an impact assessment examining the use of copyright works in the development of artificial intelligence systems which have been released under sections 135 and 136 of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025).

European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee adopts proposals on AI copyright protection

The European Parliament's Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) have adopted proposals that mandate transparency and fair remuneration for copyrighted work used by generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Court of Appeal upholds UT decision disallowing amortisation debits (Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP and others, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants’ appeals against the Upper Tribunal (UT)’s decision that amortisation debits were correctly disallowed by HMRC.

Society for Authors launches an initiative to recognise human‑written books from AI‑generated writing

The Society of Authors (SoA), in partnership with the US Authors Guild, has launched the Human Authored logo scheme to help authors distinguish human‑created work from the growing volume of AI‑generated books. The scheme aims to protect human creativity, highlight the skill, empathy and imagination involved in original writing and support fair remuneration for authors. It responds to concerns that unregulated generative AI is threatening creative careers, with SoA surveys reporting falling earnings, cancelled commissions and that 86% of authors say GenAI has already reduced their income. The SoA is calling on the UK Government to adopt an AI regulatory framework to safeguard livelihoods across the UK’s £124.6bn creative industries.