Sponsor duties and responsibilities

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

When an organisation obtains a sponsor licence it must comply with a number of duties and responsibilities to the Home Office. When it applies for the licence, it is declaring that it is capable of complying with all of these. These include:

  1. •

    monitoring immigration status and preventing illegal employment

  2. •

    maintaining migrant contact details

  3. •

    other record keeping

  4. •

    monitoring and reporting migrant activity

  5. •

    ensuring that relevant professional registrations and accreditations have been obtained

  6. •

    reporting various changes of circumstances to the sponsor

  7. •

    complying with the law, and

  8. •

    co-operating with the Home Office

The consequences of failing to comply with the duties can be serious, including the licence being downgraded or revoked and the permission of existing sponsored employees being curtailed.

It is open to the Home Office to visit an organisation or carry out a digital compliance inspection over video-conferencing facilities, to review whether, and to what extent, it will be able to meet these duties and responsibilities. It will also check its own records of previous dealings with the organisation. Inspecting officers will want to see how relevant human resources

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Immigration News

Home Office issues tender for remote English language testing services

The Home Office has published a tender notice under the Procurement Act 2023 for Home Office English Language Testing (HOELT) services, with an estimated contract value of £680m excluding VAT. The procurement seeks a fully managed remote testing service that provides secure English language testing at any location selected by customers, provided secure conditions are met.

IMB report highlights patterns of unjustified use of force in immigration detention practices

The Independent Monitoring Boards (IMB) have published a thematic report highlighting concerns that the use of force in immigration detention has become routine, inconsistent, and frequently unjustified, straying from the principles of necessity, proportionality, and respect for the dignity of those detained. The report highlights widespread issues, including the habitual and unwarranted use of handcuffs, the failure to uphold the presumption against restraint and the application of force without proper risk assessments. It also notes that force is often used inconsistently, driven by contractor preferences rather than individualised assessments, with staff regularly missing opportunities to de-escalate situations, particularly when language barriers or mental health needs are overlooked.

Number of Home Office-approved sponsor employers, by visa route, as at 13 November 2025

The below data shows the number of Home Office-approved employer sponsors, according to visa route, as listed on the Home Office’s register of licenced sponsors on the specified date. As at 13 November 2025, Skilled Worker sponsors account for the majority of employers (over 85.45%). 7.26% of sponsors have a Global Business Mobility-Senior or Specialist Worker licence, and the remaining 15 work routes account for the remaining 7.26%.

No irrationality in failing to provide e-visas to 3C migrants; R (RAMFEL) v SSHD

Immigration analysis: The Court of Appeal has ruled that the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) had not acted ‘irrationally’ by failing to provide biometric documents, or e-visa documents, to those migrants who have statutorily extended leave under section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 (IA 1971). The Court of Appeal also ruled that the SSHD, had not breached the purpose of the IA 1971, and so, had not acted contrary to the ‘Padfield’ principle. However, the question whether this non-provision has engaged statutory obligations under section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship, and Immigration Act 2009 (BCIA 2009) has been adjourned pending further arguments by both parties. Written by Parvez Anwar Pantho, caseworker at Duncan Lewis.

View Immigration by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Is it possible to add further branches to a sponsor licence where all of the entities have the same

Is it possible to add further branches to a sponsor licence where all of the entities have the same parent company, but the parent company or head office itself is not the licence holder? Also, what is the situation if one operating company applies for the licence, but the intention is to

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an
Is it possible to add further branches to a sponsor licence where all of the entities have the same

Is it possible to add further branches to a sponsor licence where all of the entities have the same

Is it possible to add further branches to a sponsor licence where all of the entities have the same parent company, but the parent company or head office itself is not the licence holder? Also, what is the situation if one operating company applies for the licence, but the intention is to

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an