The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note provides guidance on CPR 31.16 pre-action disclosure applications, where the applicant and respondent are likely to be parties to subsequent proceedings. It provides guidance on how to make such an application for disclosure before proceedings have started including the application notice, evidence in support of the pre-action application and the draft order. The response by the respondent when opposing the application is also discussed. Finally the costs consequences of an application for pre-action disclosure are considered.
For detailed guidance on when it might be appropriate to make an application for pre-action disclosure, the approach the courts take when deciding whether to grant such applications and specific discussion of pre-action disclosure in different circumstances, see Practice Note: Pre-action disclosure—requirements and the courts' approach.
An application for pre–action disclosure is an application for a court order—the basic procedure is therefore set out in CPR 23 and CPR PD 23A.
Guidance on making a CPR-compliant application can be found in Practice Note: Making an application. You should familiarise yourself with this guidance before making any application to the court—it provides the starting point for all applications governed by CPR 23/CPR PD 23A.
The following sections highlight particular aspects of the applications procedure which are specific to an application for pre-action disclosure. What follows should be read as a supplement to,
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
MedcoSTOP PRESS: A new RTA small claims protocol for whiplash claims comes into effect for accidents occurring on or after 31 May 2021. The small claims track limit for personal injury claims arising from an RTA is increased to £5000 in respect of general damages for pain, suffering and loss of
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to consider whether judicial review is be an appropriate means of addressing the issues raised by the case at hand. For further guidance, see Practice Note:
AML and counter-terrorist financing—source of funds and source of wealthSource of funds and wealth was a key focus of the SRA’s Preventing Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism thematic review, published in March 2018. Its findings included that:•most firms understood the distinction between
Financial Conduct Authority—Principles for Businesses (PRIN)This Practice Note explains the Principles for Businesses (PRIN) set down by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The Principles form part of the FCA’s High Level Standards set out in the FCA’s Handbook. The Principles are a general
0330 161 1234