Q&As
On merger of freehold and leasehold titles, HM Land Registry does not automatically enter the benefit of easements affecting the leasehold title in the registered title of the reversionary interest but requires (paragraph 3.4 of HM Land Registry Practice Guide 26) an application to be made and provision of ‘satisfactory evidence that the easement subsists for the benefit of the reversionary estate’. What would amount to ‘satisfactory evidence’? The leasehold and freehold estates are co-extensive and the servient land is in third party ownership. What evidence might be required beyond the registration of the easement in favour of the leasehold estate?
Published on: 17 January 2022
For there to be a merger of freehold and leasehold titles, the leasehold interest and the reversionary interest in a property must have come into common ownership (Burton v Barclay) of a person who holds those titles in the same capacity (Chambers v Kingham), and there is an intention to merge the two estates. That intention can be express (such as by a declaration of merger or non-merger in the transferring
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.