Judicial review—environmental matters

Published by a LexisNexis Environment expert
Practice notes

Judicial review—environmental matters

Published by a LexisNexis Environment expert

Practice notes
imgtext

Originally produced in partnership with Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers and updated by Freya Foster of Henderson Chambers.

The different routes of challenge

The vast majority of environmental protection and regulation is delivered through public bodies such as the Environment Agency, Natural England, Defra, the Secretary of State for Transport and local authorities. Holding those bodies to account and challenging the decisions, acts and omissions of those public bodies is therefore a central component of environmental law. While there are a range of courts and tribunals in which to seek review and appeal decisions (for example the General Regulatory Chamber covering some environmental appeals, the Information Tribunal covering matters relating to environmental information, and the High Court considering appeals by case stated), two common and important routes are Judicial review and statutory review. In England and Wales, both involve claims being issued in the Administrative Court, a specialist court within the Kings Bench Division of the High Court.

Deciding whether judicial review or statutory challenge is the appropriate route will depend upon the type of decision which has been made and

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Judicial review definition
What does Judicial review mean?

Judicial review is the English administrative law practice of the courts reviewing the exercise of powers by public bodies in terms of their effect on an individual.

Popular documents