The following Pensions practice note produced in partnership with Chris Ransom of CMS and Kate Richards of CMS provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
THIS PRACTICE NOTE APPLIES TO OCCUPATIONAL DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE EMPLOYER DEBT REQUIREMENTS
Corporate restructurings can frequently give rise to an employment cessation event, for example, where transfers of employees between group companies or significant redundancies take place as part of the exercise. An employer debt under section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995 can therefore be triggered, which could defeat the purpose of the group reorganisation (invariably to save money for the group and/or to improve its financial sustainability).
For more information on ‘employment cessation events’, see Practice Note: When is a section 75 debt triggered? — An employment cessation event occurs in a multi-employer scheme
Two easements from the employer debt requirements were introduced in April 2010 under the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010, SI 2010/725:
the general easement
the de minimis easement
Both easements are available to employers undertaking group restructuring exercises.
If a corporate restructuring qualifies for either easement, it will not constitute an employment cessation event and therefore no employer debt will be triggered.
However, both easements are highly prescriptive and a detailed series of steps must be completed in the correct order before an exiting employer can take advantage of them. In addition, neither easement can be used where the employer is insolvent.
The statutory requirements
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Directors’ remunerationCompany directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their
Claiming negligent misrepresentation or negligent misstatement—practical considerationsA claim for negligent misrepresentation may often be brought alongside or in the alternative to a claim for negligent misstatement. It is therefore useful to understand the key practical considerations in respect
AML and counter-terrorist financing—source of funds and source of wealthSource of funds and wealth was a key focus of the SRA’s Preventing Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism thematic review, published in March 2018. Its findings included that:•most firms understood the distinction between
AffrayAffray is an offence created by the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986). It can be tried in either the magistrates’ court or the Crown Court. The magistrates’ court may decline jurisdiction where for example in cases involving a weapon/throwing objects, or conduct that causes serious
0330 161 1234