Dealing with employer debts

Under section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995, a statutory debt (called a section 75 debt or employer debt) may become due from an employer of an underfunded defined benefit occupational pension scheme in certain circumstances. One of the key aims of the legislation is to prevent solvent employers abandoning underfunded pension schemes.

Section 75 debts are calculated on a buy-out basis. This is the basis which reflects the cost of buying out pension liabilities with an insurance company. It is an onerous basis, which means that section 75 debts can often be very expensive for employers.

Ways of dealing with a section 75 debt

Where a section 75 debt has been triggered and unless the employer is in a grace period or has entered into a deferred debt arrangement, the default position is for the employer in relation to whom the debt is triggered to pay the debt in full.

However, where the section 75 debt is triggered as a result of an employment-cessation event, the employer can also deal with the debt:

  1. through an apportionment arrangement, or

  2. through a withdrawal arrangement

For

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Minister for Pensions hosts roundtable on ‘Pound for Pound’ initiative in shift from cost to Value for Money

The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, has hosted a roundtable with regulators and leading pension providers to support a joined-up approach to Value for Money (VFM) in pensions. The event marked the first public discussion of the ‘Pound for Pound’ (‘£4£’) initiative, aimed at shifting the UK market from cost-based comparisons to broader value-based metrics, shifting market conversations away from cost towards value. This shift is essential for the success of the government’s proposed approach set out in the Pension Schemes Bill 2025. Insights from Australia’s superannuation system were central to the session, highlighting how clear benchmarking, transparency and regulatory oversight have transformed both member outcomes and the understanding of value in Australia. Intended to inform the impending regulatory consultation on VFM metrics, the superannuation system formed a key reference point as the discussion explored how lessons from Australia and insights from providers could shape regulatory thinking and support the development of the Pension Schemes Bill. Roundtable participants including the Department for Work and Pension, the Financial Conduct Authority, Pensions UK and a number of the Mansion House Accord signatories, agreed that now is the time for government, regulators and industry to collaborate in shaping and embedding a robust, fit-for-purpose VFM regime.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents