The following Dispute Resolution practice note Produced in partnership with 4 Pump Court provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Expert determination is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
This Practice Note provides guidance on when an expert’s determination may be challenged. It also considers when it may be set aside. It does so in the context of mistakes of fact, mistakes of law, departing from instructions, failure to give reason and the failure to follow the rules of natural justice and bias.
For guidance on expert determination generally, including expert determination clauses, appointment and procedure, see Practice Note: Expert determination.
For guidance on ADR more generally, see Practice Notes:
What is ADR?
Which form of ADR?
As the expert’s authority to reach a determination is wholly derived from the parties’ contract, the courts look at the contract when deciding whether the expert’s determination can be challenged. While each case will therefore depend on its facts, any party seeking to challenge an expert’s determination should bear in mind that the courts will be keen to give effect to the purpose of an expert determination clause: such parties are generally seeking a quick and inexpensive decision of a binding nature and to avoid more expensive proceedings. That intention is likely to be undermined if the courts too readily set aside expert determinations. For a detailed analysis of this, see the following News Analysis: Court of Appeal: expert valuations and mistakes of law (Premier Telecom Communications Group v Ridge).
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
On 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise rules. Alongside the Rulebook, supervisory statements and statements
Community order requirementsCommunity order requirements are set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003), as amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 (ORA 2014). Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 152(2)
The roles of nominated officer and money laundering reporting officerA nominated officer is an individual who is nominated by a firm to receive disclosures under Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) or Part III of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000)—see Requirement to appoint a
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.