Access this content for free with a 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:
- Instant clarification on points of law
- Smart search
- Workflow tools
- 42 practice areas
"In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product."
Harper Mcleod
Access all 85 documents on Non-molestation order
GET ACCESS NOWAn order obtained under Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996 protecting a party from 'molestation' prohibiting a person (the respondent) from molesting a person associated with the respondent or a relevant child.
There is no statutory definition of the term molesting although guidance can be elicited from case law. The leading case is Vaughan v Vaughan [1973] 3 All ER 449 where the court equated molestation with ‘pestering’. Molestation involves any form of physical, sexual or psychological molestation or harassment that has a serious impact on the health and well-being of the applicant. Violence is not a prerequisite. In accordance with the provisions of the Family Law Act 1996, a non-molestation order may only be granted to protect a person associated with the respondent or a relevant child as defined in that Act. Non-molestation order can also be known as: Injunction.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
Discover our 2 Checklists on Non-molestation order
Discover our 16 Practice Notes on Non-molestation order
Dive into our 2 Precedents related to Non-molestation order
See the 62 Q&As about Non-molestation order
Read the latest 5 News articles on Non-molestation order