Issues with service

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

The rules for service are set out in CPR 6, CPR PD 6A (Service within the UK) and CPR PD 6B (Service out of the jurisdiction).

This Overview identifies different types of applications which may be used when serving documents in England and Wales or in another jurisdiction. Specific requirements may apply when serving out of the jurisdiction, especially in relation to whether court permission is required and the time limits for serving the claim form outside England and Wales. For guidance, see: Cross-border service and issues with service—overview and Practice Note: Service of the claim form—time periods for service.

Service collection

The collection is a comprehensive, interactive resource designed to assist in identifying and navigating through to relevant content throughout the Lexis+® UK Dispute Resolution module. The collection enables you to view core content, ie Practice Notes, Checklists, Flowcharts. To help you navigate to the materials most relevant for the part of the service process you are interested in, the collection is divided into a series of tabs called 'phases' and 'sub-phases'. see: Serving the claim form collection.

Difficulties with service

A

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Third party costs—Court of Appeal confirms stay pending detailed assessment is case management decision (Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of a judge at first instance to stay an application for a third-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 until after the conclusion of the detailed assessment of the underlying bill of costs. Dismissing Nigeria’s appeal, the Court of Appeal held that there is no presumption that a third-party costs application should be determined before a detailed assessment. The question is purely one of case management, to be decided in accordance with the interests of justice and the overriding objective. The decision, being within the scope of discretion allowed a judge, was not amenable to appeal; that a different judge would have reached a different conclusion was not in point. Where there is a real question whether any further sum will be payable following assessment (particularly where a substantial payment on account has already been made and costs are to be assessed on the standard basis), it is legitimate to stay the third party application to avoid wasting court resources on what may prove to be a pointless satellite exercise. Of general and at least equal significance to costs practitioners were the Court of Appeal’s strong comments (obiter dicta in strict terms) deprecating disproportionate detailed assessment processes and endorsing the use of sampling as a case management tool in cases involving very significant bills of legal costs. Written by Lauren Godfrey, barrister at Gatehouse Chambers.

UKJT Control Panel Report on Control of Digital Assets

The report, published by LawTech UK on 19 March 2026, provides non-binding guidance for courts and legal practitioners on how digital assets are controlled in practice. The Panel was established at the invitation of the Lord Chancellor, following the Law Commission’s recognition that digital assets constitute a distinct ‘third category’ of property. The report emphasises that ‘control’ is a factual, functional concept, centred on the ability to exclude others, use and transfer an asset. It analyses various forms of control, including direct, multi-party, smart contract-based, delegated, and layered control, highlighting that real-world arrangements are often complex and overlapping. The report notes that the absence of a central operator and privacy-enhancing technologies may limit the effectiveness of traditional legal remedies. Overall, it points to a need for the law to develop incrementally in response to evolving technologies, with the courts adopting a flexible, context-specific approach focused on how control is in fact exercised in any given system.

Professional negligence and limitation—the roll of impecuniosity in constructive knowledge (Kay v Martineau Johnson)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal considered the correct approaches to actual knowledge and constructive knowledge in the context of solicitors’ professional negligence. Of note was the consideration of whether impecuniosity was a relevant factor in considering reasonable steps and the taking of expert advice for the purposes of the date of knowledge. Written by James Davies, barrister and Mediator at New Square Chambers.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—19 March 2026

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the publication of the King’s Bench Guide 2026, the minutes of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee following their meeting on 6 February 2026 and the High Court decision in UAB Business Enterprise v Oneta Ltd (expert and factual evidence).

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Drafting the defence—drafting tips

Drafting the defence—drafting tipsThis Practice Note provides guidance on drafting a defence to a claim brought under CPR 7. It should be read in conjunction with Practice Note: Drafting statements of case, which provides guidance on drafting statements of case in general, including formatting

Judgments and orders—setting aside

Judgments and orders—setting asideThis Practice Note considers what action may be taken on receipt of a judgment, including when you can apply to correct a judgment, revoke it, appeal it or apply to have it set aside on the grounds that the judgment was either made without jurisdiction or obtained

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid
Drafting the defence—drafting tips

Drafting the defence—drafting tips

Drafting the defence—drafting tipsThis Practice Note provides guidance on drafting a defence to a claim brought under CPR 7. It should be read in conjunction with Practice Note: Drafting statements of case, which provides guidance on drafting statements of case in general, including formatting

Judgments and orders—setting aside

Judgments and orders—setting aside

Judgments and orders—setting asideThis Practice Note considers what action may be taken on receipt of a judgment, including when you can apply to correct a judgment, revoke it, appeal it or apply to have it set aside on the grounds that the judgment was either made without jurisdiction or obtained

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid