Capital allowances

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: At Spring Budget 2024, the previous Conservative government confirmed that it would publish draft capital allowances legislation for consultation to seek views on a potential extension of full the expensing allowances (ie the 100% first-year allowance for main rate plant and machinery assets and the 50% first-year allowance for special rate assets) to include plant and machinery assets for leasing. In addition, that government announced at Autumn Statement 2023 its intention to consult on the wider legislative implications of the introduction of these first-year allowances.

For more information, see News Analysis: Autumn Statement 2023—Tax analysis and Spring Budget 2024—Tax analysis.

Autumn Budget 2024, which was delivered by the current Labour government on 30 October 2024, included the following relevant developments:

  1. •

    commitments made in the Corporate Tax Roadmap 2024 to maintain, for the duration of the Parliament, the permanent full expensing allowances (ie the 100% first-year allowances for companies on qualifying new and unused main plant and machinery and the 50% first-year allowance for companies on qualifying new and unused special rate plant and machinery), as well as the £1m annual investment allowance, writing down

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Tax News

FTT confirms partner has no right of appeal after incorrect adjustment to personal self-assessment following partnership enquiry (Michael Kelly v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Michael Kelly v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) struck out the taxpayer’s appeal due to lack of jurisdiction, holding that an individual partner has no right of appeal against amendments to his personal self-assessment return following adjustments to the partnership return. HMRC’s assessments on the partner stood, even though the tax charged could be incorrect.

Upper Tribunal confirms HMRC’s power to issue assessments under TMA 1970 regarding pension scheme unauthorised payments (Trachtenberg v Revenue and Customs Commissioners)

Pensions analysis: Mr Trachtenburg (‘A’) appealed against the decision of the FTT, upholding HMRC’s assessments under section 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970), charging him to income tax under sections 208 and 209 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004). The sole issue was whether HMRC have power to issue assessments under TMA 1970, s 29. A contended: First, that the pension provisions in FA 2004 were comprehensive, the TMA 1970 does not enable HMRC to assess in the in the absence of any express application by FA 2004, s 255 or regulations issued under it, put beyond doubt by section 255(3)(b), which states that regulations under section 255 ‘may…provide for the application of any provision of the Tax Acts (with or without modification)’, unnecessary words otherwise; and Parliament had left it to HMRC to implement the necessary regulations, but they had failed to do so. Second, that TMA 1970, s 29 did not apply to income tax under FA 2004, ss 208 and 209, which did not charge income tax ‘for a year of assessment’. The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected these arguments and dismissed the appeal. Written by Rebecca Murray, barrister at Devereux Chambers.

Double taxation tiebreakers—meaning of POEM (Haworth v HMRC)

Private Client analysis: The Court of Appeal has found that the test of ‘Place of Effective Management’ (POEM) in a double taxation treaty (DTT) is not the same as the central management and control (CMC) test for company residence. POEM is frequently used in DTTs as a tiebreaker to determine in which of two contracting states a person other than an individual (eg a company or trust) is resident for the purposes of the DTT. There is limited case law, either in the UK or internationally, on how the test should be applied. The court rejected the appellants’ submissions that a tribunal determining POEM should adopt a test derived from the CMC case of Wood v Holden, with the focus upon whether the decision-making functions of the constitutional organs have been usurped or dictated to. It found no support for this submission in authorities or materials admissible to interpret the DTT. Written by Christopher Stone KC, barrister at Devereux Chambers.

FTT dismisses taxpayer’s appeal against chargeable gains degrouping charge (Currys Retail Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Currys Retail Ltd, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal against a degrouping charge (under section 179 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992)) in respect of the goodwill in four businesses that it had acquired intra–group. The FTT held that, on a realistic view of the facts, the taxpayer retained the businesses and goodwill at the time when it left the chargeable gains group and so was subject to the degrouping charge.

View Tax by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Taxation of derivatives—chargeable gains basis rules

Taxation of derivatives—chargeable gains basis rulesThe general rule, as explained in Practice Note: Taxation of derivatives—the main rules, is that the profits and losses arising to a company from its derivative contracts are (like the profits and losses from its loan relationships) brought into

When would preference shares fall under the shares as debt rules and hence the dividend payments would

When would preference shares fall under the shares as debt rules and hence the dividend payments would fall to be taxed as debt as opposed to qualifying for the corporation tax exemption for dividend payments?The ‘shares as debt’ rules applied to shares held by companies up until 21 April 2009 (for

Is there any guidance as to the appropriateness of defining ‘Control’ as either (a) in accordance with

Is there any guidance as to the appropriateness of defining ‘Control’ as either (a) in accordance with section 1124 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, or as (b) the beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the issued share capital of a company or the legal power to direct or cause the direction of the

Distribution key concepts—repayment of capital

Distribution key concepts—repayment of capitalAlongside the concept of new consideration, which is further explained in Distribution key concepts—new consideration, the concept of repayment of capital is vital in determining whether certain transactions are distributions.At the broadest level the
Taxation of derivatives—chargeable gains basis rules

Taxation of derivatives—chargeable gains basis rules

Taxation of derivatives—chargeable gains basis rulesThe general rule, as explained in Practice Note: Taxation of derivatives—the main rules, is that the profits and losses arising to a company from its derivative contracts are (like the profits and losses from its loan relationships) brought into

When would preference shares fall under the shares as debt rules and hence the dividend payments would

When would preference shares fall under the shares as debt rules and hence the dividend payments would

When would preference shares fall under the shares as debt rules and hence the dividend payments would fall to be taxed as debt as opposed to qualifying for the corporation tax exemption for dividend payments?The ‘shares as debt’ rules applied to shares held by companies up until 21 April 2009 (for

Is there any guidance as to the appropriateness of defining ‘Control’ as either (a) in accordance with

Is there any guidance as to the appropriateness of defining ‘Control’ as either (a) in accordance with

Is there any guidance as to the appropriateness of defining ‘Control’ as either (a) in accordance with section 1124 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, or as (b) the beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the issued share capital of a company or the legal power to direct or cause the direction of the

Distribution key concepts—repayment of capital

Distribution key concepts—repayment of capital

Distribution key concepts—repayment of capitalAlongside the concept of new consideration, which is further explained in Distribution key concepts—new consideration, the concept of repayment of capital is vital in determining whether certain transactions are distributions.At the broadest level the