Intangible fixed assets

Intangible fixed assets regime (IFA regime)

The IFA regime, contained in Part 8 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009, was introduced in 2002 for the purposes of taxing companies in respect of their intangible fixed assets, which are broadly intellectual property (IP) and goodwill.

For more details, see Practice Notes: What is an intangible fixed asset? and Excluded intangible fixed assets.

The IFA regime aims to tax and relieve profits and losses in respect of intangible assets as income, generally in accordance with accounting principles.

The IFA regime provides more opportunities for corporation tax relief than was previously the case. For more details, see Practice Note: How intangible fixed assets are taxed—basic principles and Intangible fixed assets—anti-avoidance.

Tax treatment of intangible assets outside the IFA regime

Before the introduction of the IFA regime, companies were subject to corporation tax in respect of intangible assets on the basis of general tax principles (largely enshrined in case law) that still apply for individuals. Broadly, outside of the IFA regime, acquisitions and disposals of IP (other than patents) held otherwise than as trading stock are

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Legislation Day: Draft Finance Bill 2026—Private Client analysis

Private Client analysis: On Legislation Day, 21 July 2025, the government published draft provisions to be included in Finance Bill 2026 (FB 2026, also known as Finance Bill 2025–26) together with accompanying explanatory notes and other supporting documents. The government also published consultation responses and made other announcements of interest to Private Client practitioners. This analysis provides an overview of the key Private Client tax provisions together with initial reactions from the market.

Legislation Day: Draft Finance Bill 2026—Tax analysis

Tax analysis: On Legislation Day, 21 July 2025, the government published draft provisions for inclusion in Finance Bill 2026 (FB 2026, also known as Finance Bill 2025–26), together with accompanying explanatory notes and other supporting documents. This analysis brings together the key business tax measures. Expert commentary has been provided by the LexisNexis Tax Consulting Editorial Board and Andersen, Blick Rothernberg, CMS, Eversheds Sutherland, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer, Macfarlanes and Pinsent Masons.

FTT confirms partner has no right of appeal after incorrect adjustment to personal self-assessment following partnership enquiry (Michael Kelly v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Michael Kelly v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) struck out the taxpayer’s appeal due to lack of jurisdiction, holding that an individual partner has no right of appeal against amendments to his personal self-assessment return following adjustments to the partnership return. HMRC’s assessments on the partner stood, even though the tax charged could be incorrect.

Upper Tribunal confirms HMRC’s power to issue assessments under TMA 1970 regarding pension scheme unauthorised payments (Trachtenberg v Revenue and Customs Commissioners)

Pensions analysis: Mr Trachtenburg (‘A’) appealed against the decision of the FTT, upholding HMRC’s assessments under section 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970), charging him to income tax under sections 208 and 209 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004). The sole issue was whether HMRC have power to issue assessments under TMA 1970, s 29. A contended: First, that the pension provisions in FA 2004 were comprehensive, the TMA 1970 does not enable HMRC to assess in the in the absence of any express application by FA 2004, s 255 or regulations issued under it, put beyond doubt by section 255(3)(b), which states that regulations under section 255 ‘may…provide for the application of any provision of the Tax Acts (with or without modification)’, unnecessary words otherwise; and Parliament had left it to HMRC to implement the necessary regulations, but they had failed to do so. Second, that TMA 1970, s 29 did not apply to income tax under FA 2004, ss 208 and 209, which did not charge income tax ‘for a year of assessment’. The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected these arguments and dismissed the appeal. Written by Rebecca Murray, barrister at Devereux Chambers.