SCAFFOLD licence—Long form Permitting scaffold to be erected in relation to the Works at [insert] This Deed is made on [date] Parties 1 [insert name of licensee] (company registration number [insert]) whose registered office is at [insert] ('Licensee'); [and] 2 [insert name of licensor] (company registration number [insert]) whose registered office is at [insert] (‘Licensor')[; and OR .] 3 [[insert name of developer] (company registration number [insert]) whose registered office is at [insert] ('Developer')[; and OR .] ] 4 [[insert name of tenant] (company registration number [insert]) whose registered office is at [insert] ('Tenant').] Recitals (A) The Developer has engaged the licensee to carry out the Works at the Site. (B) The Licensor is the registered proprietor of the Affected Property[ and the Tenant is the tenant of the Affected Property under a lease granted by the Licensor]. (C) In connection with the Works the Licensee proposes to erect, use and maintain the Scaffolding on the Affected Property. (D) The Licensor [and the Tenant] [has OR have] agreed, on the terms and subject to the conditions set out in this Agreement, to authorise the Licensee to erect, use and retain the Scaffolding on the Affected Property.

The revenue streams for a storage project will depend on the relevant electricity market, technology, project size and whether the project is applied ‘behind’ the meter to serve the needs of a specific site or connected to the grid. Storage is typically able to capture value in some or all of the following ways: • the provision of grid services (frequency response, Capacity Market revenues, demand-side response) • market price arbitrage, • the smoothing of generation output and avoidance of imbalance costs in a hybrid project where an underlying (and typically intermittent) electricity generation facility is co-located with a storage facility These forms of revenue are all explained in more detail below. Investors will want the flexibility to ‘stack’ (ie combine) revenues, perhaps relying on different income sources at different times of day or year, while debt financiers will be looking for a longer-term base contracted revenue-stream to under-pin the debt repayment and/or assessing the management experience and creditworthiness of the corporate entity. In Great Britain (GB), despite

The National Crime Agency (NCA) has announced that Thalha Jubair, from East London, and Owen Flowers, from Walsall, West Midlands, both leading members of the Scattered Spider cybercriminal collective, were each sentenced to five years and six months imprisonment on 16 July 2026 at Woolwich Crown Court. Both pleaded guilty on 22 June 2026 to hacking Transport for London's (TfL) network between 31 August 2024 and 3 September 2024, in only the second UK prosecution under section 3ZA of the Computer Misuse Act 1990. The individuals were arrested on 16 September 2024 by the NCA and City of London Police. TfL reported £29 million in losses and recovery costs, with 148 systems rendered inoperable, all 27,000 employees required to attend offices for mandatory password resets and data from its Oyster refunds system accessed. Disrupted services included Dial-a-Ride, concessionary travel cards and digital payments.

In the family law context, an application for financial provision in respect of a child under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 for maintenance or capital provision.

Family analysis: The court was concerned with Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) proceedings between the applicant mother and respondent father. The two children who were subject of the proceedings were aged four and two years. Mr Justice Peel commented on the costs of the litigation, where the mother’s costs were £906,000 (including VAT) and the father’s costs were £659,000 (VAT not being payable), arising from the antipathy and mistrust between the parties. He also highlighted that the role of the court is to approach the case dispassionately to arrive at fair financial provision for the children and in analysing the parties’ submissions, the court was disapproving of the mother’s description of the parties’ standard of living and the children’s needs, describing the mother as having projected some of her aspirations within the children’s stated needs. Poonam Bhari, barrister at 3PB Chambers, considers the decision.

Pursuant to paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the court may make, on the application of a child who has reached the age of 18 and who will still be in education or undergoing vocational training (or there are special circumstances which justify the making of the order, for example a disability), an order requiring

Order under which the government decides how much preserved benefits should increase between a member leaving a scheme and his normal pension date.

Under the Master Trust legislation, Continuity Option 1 (CO1) is effectively the transfer and statutory wind up process, as detailed in Schedule 5 of the Occupational Pension Schemes (Master Trusts) Regulations 2018, SI 2018/1030 (the Master Trust Regulations). The process involves sending notices to the employers and members so they are kept informed and know what their options are. In particular, under the Master Trust Regulations, Sch 5, para 5, on receiving a trustee notice, employers have the choice of either: • accepting the choice of ‘trustee default scheme’ in relation to members ‘then employed by it’, or • opting to nominate an alternative scheme as the ‘employer default scheme’ for those members The terms ‘trustee default scheme’ and ‘employer default scheme’ are defined under

A set of amendments to a standard form contract whereby the parties set out agreed amendments to the published terms. It must therefore be read in conjunction with the standard form. Any schedule of amendments must be properly incorporated into the contract.

The Contract comprises the completed Constructing Excellence Contract 2024 Edition published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: CONTRACT PARTICULARS The Contract Particulars as completed by the Parties shall apply subject to the following amendments: Part 1: Details Relevant to the Conditions 4.33 Rectification Period [Insert a new bullet point after the second bullet point stating ‘from receipt of the completion certificate from the Building Safety Regulator in respect of’] 8.6 Limitation on liability of Supplier Delete entry 12.1 Supplementary Conditions—footnote on clause 12.3 Delete from footnote 20: ‘clause 12.3 (The Public Contracts Regulations 2015) only applies where stated in those provisions’ Part 8: Third Party Rights and Collateral Warranties 8.A.3.3 The liability of the Supplier to each Beneficiary shall under no circumstances exceed £___ in respect of each breach/in the aggregate* Delete entry ATTESTATION Attestation This Contract has been executed and delivered as a deed by the Parties. CONDITIONS Clause 1.1—Definitions Insert and amend definitions as follows: [ BIM Protocol [ See drafting note ] ‘Building Safety Regulator [Insert and amend new definition:the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) or such other body or individual as may be appointed from time to time to fulfil the

Schedule of amendments to the jct Construction Management Appointment 2016 The Contract comprises the completed Construction Management Appointment 2016 (CM/A 2016) published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: ARTICLES Article 1: Construction Manager’s obligations Article 1 Delete ‘the obligations set out in clause 2.1’ and substitute ‘its obligations and duties’. Article 3: Principal Designer Article 3 In the first line after ‘for the purposes of the CDM Regulations’, insert ‘and the Dutyholder Regulations’ Article 4: Principal Contractor Article 4 In the first line, after ‘for the purposes of the CDM Regulations’, insert ‘and the Dutyholder Regulations’At the end of Article 4 insert:‘The Contract Sum includes the Construction Manager’s price for fulfilling the duties of Principal Contractor.’ Article 6: Arbitration Article 6 Arbitration Delete Article 6 and insert: ‘All references to arbitration in this Contract are deleted.’ Article 8 Insert new Article 8 as follows: Article 8 [To be added on the face of the contract] ‘Schedule of Amendments The Employer and the Construction Manager agree that the modifications in the Schedule of Amendments attached hereto (as initialled by the parties) are incorporated into this Contract and the provisions

Schedule of amendments to the jct Construction Management trade contract 2016 The Trade Contract comprises the completed Construction Management Trade Contract 2016 (CM/TC 2016) published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: RECITALS [ See drafting note ] ARTICLES Article 6 Article 6 Principal Designer After ‘for the purposes of the CDM Regulations’, insert ‘and the Dutyholder Regulations’. Article 7 Article 7 Principal Contractor After ‘for the purposes of the CDM Regulations’, insert ‘and the Dutyholder Regulations’. Article 8 Article 8 Arbitration Delete Article 8 and insert ‘Not used.’ Article 10 Insert new Article 10 as follows: ‘Article 10 [To be added on the face of the contract] Schedule of Amendments The Employer and the Trade Contractor agree that the modifications in the Schedule of Amendments attached hereto (as initialled by the Parties) shall be incorporated into this Trade Contract and the provisions of the Agreement, the Conditions and the Schedules annexed to the Conditions shall have effect as modified by the Schedule of Amendments which together comprise the ‘Trade Contract’. If there is any discrepancy between the Agreement and/or the Conditions and the Schedule of Amendments, the wording of the