Refine By
Clear all filter
About 92778 results for "*"
PRECEDENTS
I am writing in response to your data subject request dated [insert date of request], which we received on [insert date]. You will recall you objected to our processing your data [confirm the basis of the objection,
PRECEDENTS
Dear [insert name of individual making request] I am writing in response to your data subject request dated [insert date of request], which we received on [insert date]. You will recall you objected to our processing your data [confirm the basis of the objection, eg the grounds relating to their particular situation relied on by the data subject]. Unfortunately, we are unable to comply with your request
PRECEDENTS
Dear [insert name of individual making request] I am writing in response to your data subject request dated [insert date of request], which we received on [insert date]. You asked for [confirm precisely what was requested, eg ‘personal data that you provided to us to be transmitted in a suitable format to your new service
PRECEDENTS
Dear [insert name of individual making request] I am writing in response to your data subject request dated [insert date of request], which we received on [insert date]. You have asked us to [confirm precisely what was requested, eg restrict processing of the personal data that we hold about you rather than deleting it in accordance with our data destruction policies]. We have complied with your request and have restricted processing of [all OR the relevant] personal
PRECEDENTS
Dear [insert name of individual making request] I am writing in response to your data subject request dated [insert date of request], which we received on [insert date]. You asked us to [confirm precisely what was requested, eg restrict processing of the personal data that we hold about you as it is no longer needed for its original purpose]. We are unable to comply with your request
PRECEDENTS
1 The Respondent is [insert Respondent's name and address]. 2 Any communication relating to this appeal may be sent to the Respondent at [insert address for service, including email address and telephone number, if any]. 3 The Respondent intends to resist the appeal of [insert name of appellant]. The grounds on which the Respondent will rely are [the grounds relied upon by the employment tribunal for making the judgment, decision or order appealed from[.] AND/OR the following grounds: [insert details of grounds relied upon, see examples given at 3.1 and 3.2 below]]: 3.1 The tribunal's judgment is further
PRACTICE NOTES
This Practice Note looks at Employer’s Requirements (also referred to as ERs) within a building contract. It explains what Employer’s Requirements are and how, depending on the procurement approach and the building contract, the party who will be responsible for them might vary. It also looks at the approach to Employer’s Requirements in some of the standard forms, and the impact of the CIS v Henry Boot case. What are Employer's Requirements? The expression 'Employer’s Requirements' (ERs) is used in JCT and FIDIC contracts to describe the document(s) produced by the employer to set out its requirements in relation to the project (including performance specifications, drawings, initial designs etc) and this is what the design and construction of the works will be based on. The approach in the NEC suite is slightly different: in NEC3 the documents that contain the ‘Works Information’ provided by the employer (ie that set out its requirements) are identified in Part One of the Contract Data. The NEC4 suite takes the same approach as NEC3 but the 'Works Information' is re-named
GLOSSARY
Under Rule 19.2, each document or advertisement published in connection with an offer by, or on behalf of, the offeror or the offeree, must state that the directors of the offeror and/or, where appropriate, the offeree accept responsibility for the information contained in the document or advertisement and that, to the best of their knowledge and belief (having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in the document or advertisement is in accordance with the facts and, where appropriate, that it does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information. The expression may also refer to the responsibility letters that the directors of the offeror and offeree are required to provide in connection with a takeover offer confirming to the board and its advisers that the directors understand their responsibilities for information published in connection with the offer.
NEWS
Commercial analysis: In 2022, twenty-four migrant workers from Nepal and Bangladesh brought a claim in the High Court against Dyson. They alleged that, while working between 2011 and 2022 at ATA Industrial and Jabco Filter Systems, two Malaysian factories in Dyson’s supply chain, they were subjected to conditions amounting to forced labour: excessive hours, restrictions on movement, confiscation of passports, hazardous working environments, overcrowded accommodation, unlawful detention, intimidation, assault and torture. Many were recruited and trafficked coercively. Written by Emily Nicholson, partner, Dan Gray, sustainable business knowledge leader, and Dan Frossell, legal professional of Mishcon de Reya.
PRECEDENTS
1 Introduction 1.1 [Insert organisation’s name] recognises the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform the way we work and improve the [products and ]services we provide. 1.2 We are committed to ensuring we use AI in a secure and responsible way, respecting privacy, confidentiality and third-party rights. This includes any AI used by third-parties on our behalf. 1.3 Like most businesses, we are using ever more sophisticated analytics and technology to deliver our [products and ]services. These Principles set out our approach to using AI in the course of our business. They are underpinned by our commitment to corporate responsibility, which we define as [insert, eg the way we do business, working pro-actively to increase our positive impact and prevent negative impact]. 1.4 Generally, we use the term ‘artificial intelligence’ to describe machine-based systems, including generative AI systems, which infer solutions to set tasks and have a degree of autonomy. The scope of these Principles, however, is broader than AI and includes any machine-driven insights resulting from the use of systems and techniques within the field of data science. 1.5 We already
PRACTICE NOTES
The Responsible Actors Scheme (RAS) is a ‘building industry scheme’ for property developers in England. Members of the RAS must enter into a contract with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (developer remediation contracts), under which they will be required to identify and remediate, or pay for the remediation of, life-critical fire safety defects in residential buildings over 11 meters in height, which they developed or refurbished in England between 1992 and 2022. The RAS was established in July 2023, by the Building Safety (Responsible Actors Scheme and Prohibitions) Regulations 2023, SI 2023/753 (BS(RAS&P) Regs 2023), using powers conferred on the government by the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022). The BS(RAS&P) Regs 2023 came into force on 4 July 2023. For more information on the background to the RAS, and guidance on which developers are eligible to join the RAS, what its conditions or membership are, and when membership may be revoked, see Practice Note: Responsible Actors Scheme—eligibility and membership. Parties that fail to join the RAS when they are eligible
PRACTICE NOTES
The Responsible Actors Scheme (RAS) is a ‘building industry scheme’ for property developers in England. Members of the RAS must enter into a contract with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC), under which they will be required to identify and remediate, or pay for the remediation of, life-critical fire safety defects in certain residential buildings that they developed or refurbished in England between 1992 and 2022. The RAS was established in July 2023, by the Building Safety (Responsible Actors Scheme and Prohibitions) Regulations 2023, SI 2023/753 (BS(RAS&P) Regs 2023), using powers conferred on the government by the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022). This Practice Note considers which developers are eligible to join the RAS, what its conditions of membership are, and when membership may be revoked. For information on development and building control prohibitions, which are also a key part of the RAS and may apply to parties in default of their obligations under the BS(RAS&P) Regs 2023, see Practice Note: Responsible Actors Scheme—development and building control prohibitions. In May 2026, the