Local Government analysis: The local authority in this case had failed to retain a copy of a key letter which statute requires must be sent to an applicant for housing who is being offered a tenancy in the private sector. That letter must contain warnings required by statute and if the local authority cannot prove it was sent, the housing duty will not have been fulfilled, even if the applicant has been living in the offered accommodation for many years. This is what happened in this case, and that error was compounded by the second offer of accommodation, being effectively one to live in an open brothel, when the applicant had been given refugee status in this country, due to her past sexual exploitation and trafficking. Again, that offer was held to be of no effect—such that, despite living in two properties since 2015, the local authority was held never to have discharged its homelessness duty to the claimant. Written by Adam Heppinstall, barrister, Henderson Chambers.