Third parties rights against insurers

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Relevant legislation

The Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 replaced the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 to allow parties to make a claim against another party’s insurer directly, where the defaulting party has become

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

Issue 168 of Insolvency Service’s Dear IP published

The Insolvency Service reports that the Information Sharing (Disclosure by the Registrar) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/1378), effective from 20 December 2024, will enable the Registrar of Companies to disclose non-public information to insolvency practitioners (IPs) and The Financial Conduct Authority has published updated guidance (FG25/2) for IPs handling regulated firms, incorporating Consumer Duty requirements. Following the Pindar Scarborough Ltd (in Administration) [2024] EWHC 908 and Boughey & Anor v Toogood International Transport and Agricultural Service Ltd (in administration) [2024] EWHC 1425 court judgments, the Insolvency Service has revised its interpretation of 'creditor' status in terms of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), adopting a context-specific approach rather than maintaining its previous fixed-point definition.

The Supreme Court tweaks Etridge (Waller Edwards v One Savings Bank plc)

Property Disputes analysis: English property law periodically produces epoch-making decisions of the highest court. In years to come, Waller Edwards v One Savings Bank plc may well become such a decision. It enjoys the respectable jurisprudential lineage of three famous House of Lords’ decisions: Barclays Bank v O’Brien, CIBC Mortgages v Pitt, and Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge, but it also applies established principles in a novel way. Written by Marc Beaumont, Windsor Chambers.

Insolvency Service publishes updated guidance on post-insolvency company formation rules

The Insolvency Service has published updated guidance outlining rules for directors seeking to establish new companies following insolvency. The update details requirements for asset transfers, staff transitions under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE), and potential HMRC security deposits for tax compliance. The guidance specifies that while similar business activities are permitted, restrictions apply to reusing insolvent company names and assets must be properly transferred through liquidators or administrators.

Insolvency Service publishes updated redundancy payments case setup guidance and templates

The Insolvency Service has published updated guidance and templates for insolvency practitioners managing redundancy payment cases through the Redundancy Payments Service. The revised documentation provides expanded instructions for new case setup requests, the provision of employee information, and handling complex cases that involve multiple redundancies.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin
What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin