Validity of Wills

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19): For Wills made on or after 31 January 2020, the formal requirement for a valid Will to be witnessed in the presence of two witnesses includes both physical and virtual presence, to allow Wills to be validly witnessed remotely by way of video conference. For the latest guidance on this temporary change (which takes effect for Wills made up to and including 31 January 2024), see Practice Note: Coronavirus (COVID-19)—Wills [ARCHIVED]. This change is introduced by the Wills Act 1837 (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Order 2020, SI 2020/952 which amends Wills Act 1837 (WA 1837), s 9 and the Wills Act 1837 (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) Order 2022, SI 2022/18. Note that the guidance below relates to WA 1837 in its unchanged form. For details of the new rules and the changes to WA 1837, s 9, see Practice Note: Coronavirus (COVID-19)—remote witnessing of Wills [ARCHIVED] [ARCHIVED].The WA 1837Amendment Order,  SI 2020/952 was expressed to apply to Wills and codicils made between 31 January 2020

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

Private Client weekly highlights—18 September 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) the Law Society’s briefing to Parliament on the Assisted Dying and the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill; (2) CIOT responses to Finance Bill 2025–26 and draft legislation on IHT Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief, modernising and mandating tax adviser registration with HMRC, and proposals to close in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance; (3) the FTT decision in Collingwood v Revenue and Customs Commissioners that sponsorship payments are taxable as income; (4) potential reform of pension salary sacrifice arrangements in the November Budget; (5) analysis of Peter Dunn v Kostas Kazolides which addresses questions about limitation periods, insolvency, the formal requirements for the execution of deeds, and how variation to the contract between the principal debtor and creditor may discharge a guarantor; and (6) CCCL publishes updated Guidance to Business and Property Work at Central London.

Question of the week: A claim (issued protectively) under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 is due to be settled at mediation. It has been over two years since the date of death, so the parties will not benefit from any retrospective tax treatment associated with a Deed of Variation. Would the parties need to execute both a Deed of Variation and a Settlement Agreement, or would a Settlement Agreement executed as a deed suffice?

This Q&A reviews tax treatment of a resolution of a Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 by mediation.

HMCTS review finds digital court reforms improved speed and access but challenges remain

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published its evaluation of digital reforms across seven civil, family and tribunal services. The study found digitalisation generally improved access to justice and case timeliness, with uptake boosted by mandatory use for professionals and pandemic-driven increases in digital confidence. However, persistent technical issues, uneven user experience, and language barriers limited benefits for some groups.

Private Client weekly highlights—11 September 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) the Non-Contentious Probate (Amendment) Rules 2025, which come into force on 3 November 2025; (2) British Camelids Ltd (personal representative of Candia Midworth) v Brooke Hospital for Animals), in which gifts for certain charitable entities were construed as gifts for their charitable purposes rather than being conditional on their continued legal existence at the time of testatrix’s death; (3) HM Treasury publishes policy note and draft regulations on reforming the Money Laundering regime, including a general de minimis exclusion from registration under the TRS; (4) the third and last part of our series on the corporate offence of failure to prevent fraud; (5) Kingdom Hall Trust v Davies, which held that prescriptive easements can be acquired over charitable land if the rights were established during a period of prior non-charitable ownership; (6) Re A (Habitual Residence), a case concerning the lawfulness of the relocation of a protected party from Spain to the UK; and (7) Law Commission’s 14th programme of reform.

View Private Client by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Personal representatives and trustees—power of appropriation

Personal representatives and trustees—power of appropriationAppropriation is a process by which a personal representative (PR) or a trustee uses a specific asset in the estate or trust fund to meet, in full or in part, a beneficiary’s entitlement or interest.Personal representatives' common law and

Where a beneficiary is present when a Will is signed and witnessed, but is not an attesting witness to

Where a beneficiary is present when a Will is signed and witnessed, but is not an attesting witness to the Will, are there any grounds to challenge that beneficiary's entitlement under the Will?See Practice Note: Requirements for a valid Will which sets out the formalities for the proper execution

Contents of Wills—rules of apportionment

Contents of Wills—rules of apportionmentThe rules of apportionment should be considered at the moment of drafting the Will. Whenever a Will creates a trust, some rules of apportionment may be applied or excluded unless they have been dealt with expressly in the wording of the Will.Essentially, the

Failure of gifts—lapse

Failure of gifts—lapseThere are a number of reasons why a gift may fail, including where a gift has lapsed. For further guidance on the various reasons for the failure of a testamentary gift, see Practice Note: Failure of gifts—effects. This Practice Note considers the doctrine of lapse in more
Personal representatives and trustees—power of appropriation

Personal representatives and trustees—power of appropriation

Personal representatives and trustees—power of appropriationAppropriation is a process by which a personal representative (PR) or a trustee uses a specific asset in the estate or trust fund to meet, in full or in part, a beneficiary’s entitlement or interest.Personal representatives' common law and

Where a beneficiary is present when a Will is signed and witnessed, but is not an attesting witness to

Where a beneficiary is present when a Will is signed and witnessed, but is not an attesting witness to

Where a beneficiary is present when a Will is signed and witnessed, but is not an attesting witness to the Will, are there any grounds to challenge that beneficiary's entitlement under the Will?See Practice Note: Requirements for a valid Will which sets out the formalities for the proper execution

Contents of Wills—rules of apportionment

Contents of Wills—rules of apportionment

Contents of Wills—rules of apportionmentThe rules of apportionment should be considered at the moment of drafting the Will. Whenever a Will creates a trust, some rules of apportionment may be applied or excluded unless they have been dealt with expressly in the wording of the Will.Essentially, the

Failure of gifts—lapse

Failure of gifts—lapse

Failure of gifts—lapseThere are a number of reasons why a gift may fail, including where a gift has lapsed. For further guidance on the various reasons for the failure of a testamentary gift, see Practice Note: Failure of gifts—effects. This Practice Note considers the doctrine of lapse in more