Revocation, republication and revival

Revocation

A Will may be revoked through operation of law (involuntary revocation) or by a deliberate act of the testator (voluntary revocation). A Will is revocable by law automatically on:

  1. marriage

  2. civil partnership

According to section 20 of the Wills Act 1837 (WA 1837) voluntary revocation may be effected by:

'…another Will or codicil executed in manner herein-before required, or by some writing declaring an intention to revoke the same and executed in the manner in which a Will is herein-before required to be executed, or by the burning, tearing, or otherwise destroying the same by the testator, or by some person in his presence and by his direction, with the intention of revoking the same.'

Revocation may be presumed to have occurred where the Will is mutilated or lost. Both presumptions are rebuttable by evidence to the contrary.

See Practice Note: Revocation of Wills.

Republication

WA 1837, s 22 permits two methods of republication, either express or constructive. If either method is used, the Will is republished. The effect of republication is mainly to change the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Private Client News

All in? Court confirms when a settlement is 'made' for the purposes of excluded property (Accuro Trust (Switzerland) SA v The Commissioners for HMRC)

Private Client analysis: This case considered the meaning of 'relevant property' under the settlements regime of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (IHTA 1984) and, in particular, the time at which this definition is to be tested. The question arose as to whether the trustees of an offshore trust established by a non-UK domiciled settlor were subject to the UK settlements regime in respect of property added to the trust after the settlor became deemed domiciled in the UK, or whether they were exempt from such charges as the trust consisted solely of excluded property. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that whether trust property is excluded property is based on the status of the trust at the time that it was established, not at the time that the property in question was added to the settlement. As a result, the trust in this case did consist solely of excluded property and no inheritance tax (IHT) charges arose as a result of either the ten-year anniversary or capital distributions. The FTT was also asked to consider whether their jurisdiction was appellate, or supervisory only. The FTT held that, while their jurisdiction was supervisory, the questions raised by the trustees were relevant in establishing whether HMRC had acted reasonably and that the outcome (ie that the paid IHT should be refunded and that no further IHT was due) would be the same in either case. Written by Katherine Willmott, senior associate solicitor at Foot Anstey LLP.

View Private Client by content type :

Popular documents