Proving negligence or breach of statutory duty

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

This Overview provides a summary of the main principles that govern liability in most personal injury claims. Detailed guidance on the legal issues for specific types of personal injury claim can be found on the Topics page of the PI & Clinical Negligence practical guidance homepage under the ‘Types of claim’ heading.

Liability can also arise other than from negligence or breach of statutory duty. For example, a claim may arise from a deliberate assault or a claim may need to be pursued through a scheme such as the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme.

Duty of care in personal injury claims

For a claimant to succeed in proving their personal injury claim in common law negligence, they must first prove that a duty of care was owed by the defendant. When assessing whether a duty of care exists the court will consider whether there is an established precedent for the relationship between the parties, eg as between motorists and other road users. The court will then follow these precedents unless it is necessary to consider whether they should be departed from.

If a practitioner is faced

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—2 April 2026

This week's edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes a new series of videos offering concise clinical overviews to help...

Withdrawal of admissions in a clinical negligence case (Ramsdale v Ditta)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: The court permitted a practice nurse, a defendant in a clinical negligence claim, to withdraw admissions of breach...

The latest twist in the law concerning the recoverability of expert agency fees (JXX v Archibald II)

Dispute Resolution analysis: Senior Costs Judge Rowley, in his second judgment in this case, undertook an assessment of expert medical agency fees...

NHS Resolution publishes report highlighting improved maternity safety engagement

NHS Resolution has published a report evaluating its Maternity (Perinatal) Incentive Scheme (MIS), covering 2018–2024, assessing its impact on...

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Vicarious liability in road traffic accidents

Vicarious liability in road traffic accidentsIn the past, a defendant would only have been vicariously liable for the negligence of a driver if the driver was acting in the course of their employment for the defendant. The law has developed significantly since then. If the driver was not an employee

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal hearing or allocate the case to a track and give standard fast track directions?Setting aside default judgmentWhere a claimant has obtained default judgment, a defendant may still wish to defend

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection test

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection testThis Practice Notes considers the circumstances in which the court will hold an employer vicariously liable for a tort which has been committed by an employee. The courts’ approach to the ‘close connection’ test has evolved

Material contribution in personal injury claims

Material contribution in personal injury claimsThis Practice Note deals with how the principle of material contribution operates where there are multiple defendants or causes of an injury, the different approach taken by the courts to causation in disease cases and whether the material contribution
Vicarious liability in road traffic accidents

Vicarious liability in road traffic accidents

Vicarious liability in road traffic accidentsIn the past, a defendant would only have been vicariously liable for the negligence of a driver if the driver was acting in the course of their employment for the defendant. The law has developed significantly since then. If the driver was not an employee

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal hearing or allocate the case to a track and give standard fast track directions?Setting aside default judgmentWhere a claimant has obtained default judgment, a defendant may still wish to defend

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection test

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection test

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection testThis Practice Notes considers the circumstances in which the court will hold an employer vicariously liable for a tort which has been committed by an employee. The courts’ approach to the ‘close connection’ test has evolved

Material contribution in personal injury claims

Material contribution in personal injury claims

Material contribution in personal injury claimsThis Practice Note deals with how the principle of material contribution operates where there are multiple defendants or causes of an injury, the different approach taken by the courts to causation in disease cases and whether the material contribution