Share sales

The existence of pension arrangements can add complexity and risk to even the most straightforward of corporate transactions. The levels of risk and difficulties involved will depend on:

  1. the nature of the transaction (eg whether it is a share or business sale), and

  2. the nature of the target company's pension arrangements

What is a share sale?

Share sales involve the purchase of the issued share capital of a target company. Through this acquisition, the buyer is commercially impacted by all the contracts and deeds entered into by the target company. Acquisition of the target does not change the terms of contracts of employment the target company has agreed with its employees: the rights of both the target company and its employees continue irrespective of the target's change of ownership.

Considerations for the buyer and the seller

When it comes to dealing with pensions issues on a share sale, the key stages of a share sale can be divided up as follows:

  1. where the target company participates in a trust-based occupational pension scheme, the seller must, as part of its preparations to the share

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

Pension Schemes Bill: Employer surplus-payment provisions pass Grand Committee scrutiny unchanged

At the third day of Grand Committee on the Pension Schemes Bill on 19 January 2026, the House of Lords undertook an extensive examination of Clauses 9 (Power to modify scheme to allow for payment of surplus to employer) and 10 (Restrictions on exercise of power to pay surplus), with debate focused on a series of amendments that tested how far the new surplus release regime should be constrained in primary legislation. In particular, peers tabled amendments seeking to change the terminology from ‘surplus’ to ‘assets’, to require surplus to be shared with members, to mandate benefit enhancements including inflation protection, to strengthen member notification or consultation (including trade union involvement) in the surplus release process, to constrain the Secretary of State’s regulation-making powers, to embed actuarial and endgame requirements in statute, and to alter insolvency priorities where employers had previously extracted surplus. The government response, delivered principally by Baroness Sherlock, consistently resisted the amendments to prescriptive statutory rules governing the use of surplus or the processes surrounding its release, and instead defended the Bill’s reliance on trustee discretion, fiduciary duties, actuarial certification, and regulatory oversight by the Pensions Regulator.  All amendments were either withdrawn or not moved following government opposition, and Clauses 9 and 10 were agreed without amendment.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents