Regulated industries

There is a diverse range of pension arrangements which tend to operate on an industry-wide basis. The schemes generally operate as trust-based funded occupational pension schemes and are not statutory public service schemes like those that operate in the central and local government sectors. Such schemes include:

•
the Combined Nuclear Pension Plan
•
the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme (ESPS)
•
the Railways Pension Scheme
•
the Water Pension Schemes
•
the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS)

The schemes tend to be administered on a centralised basis with an independent trustee. Some schemes like the Railways Pension Scheme and the ESPS are split into segregated employer sections, whereas other schemes like the USS operate on a ‘last man standing’ pooled basis. It is therefore difficult to draw any common similarities about the way in which these schemes are structured as they have their own, often unique, features.

The Universities Superannuation Scheme

The

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Pension trustees urged by TPR to help shape FCA’s targeted support rules

Law360: The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has called on trustees to respond to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA’s) consultation on a major shake-up of rules guiding what level of financial guidance can be issued by regulated firms and advisers to defined contribution (DC) pension savers.

Pension correctly calculated by PPF to include reduction for early retirement, and inconvenience suffered by member did not meet threshold for distress award (Mr H, CAS-79442-Z7F9)

Pensions analysis: The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman has rejected a complaint about incorrect information. Martin Scott of gunnercooke LLP looks at the decision.

Former TPO chair writes to Committee on benefits of Pensions Dishonesty Unit amid loss of government funding

The Pensions Ombudsman's (TPO) former Interim Chair Anthony Arter has written to the Work and Pensions Select Committee regarding the Department for Work and Pensions' (DWP) decision to end funding for TPO’s Pensions Dishonesty Unit (PDU). The letter was prompted by the Committee’s interest in the work of the PDU, established by Arter in his former role as the Pensions Ombudsman in November 2021. Arter notes that PDU determinations have resulted in sanctions whereby individuals are banned from acting as directors and are prohibited from holding trusteeship roles in the future. In cases where an individual has filed for bankruptcy, a finding of dishonesty means they cannot be discharged until the required repayments are made. According to Arter, holding fraudsters accountable in a public manner not only validates the loss and suffering of the affected members but also contributes to a reduction in future scams by curtailing fraudsters' abilities. Additionally, Arter sees TPO as playing a vital role by collaborating with agencies such as the Pensions Regulator and Action Fraud to combat pension scams. The letter emphasises that with improved public finances in the future, it is hoped that additional funding would continue such important work. Arter notes that among pension complaints, losing one’s entire savings due to a scam ranks as one of the most severe.

No obligation on PPF to warn member about consequences of taking early retirement before pension scheme entered assessment period (Mr S, CAS-98051-N8F9)

Pensions analysis: The Pensions Ombudsman has rejected a complaint about information given on early retirement terms. Martin Scott of gunnercooke LLP looks at the decision.